To send a letter to the editor click here
Disappointed in how town being run
Dear Editor,
Recently I moved back to Sylvan Lake and am a little disappointed in what I see and how the town is run.
This morning I went out and put the stop sign back up at the corner of my house which the drunks walking up and down the hill from bar to bar keep pulling out. Is “I’m drunk” now an excuse for “I’m not responsible for my actions”?
With whole neighbourhoods going up in one year’s time, can we not complete two or three washrooms on the beach?
Road crews seem to pave 40 kilometres of asphalt in one season, but we cannot pave one quarter of a kilometre on Lakeshore Drive.
They used to refer to Sylvan as the ‘French Riviera of Alberta’ but, now that we don’t drain the lake off there is no beach to speak of.
The campgrounds have become obsolete from the town site.
It seems our focus is no longer on tourism for the summer months.
On Canada Day, we had a beautiful 20 minute fireworks show which the townspeople will remember this winter when the snow is not removed off the streets or in the summer when the laneways are not groomed and they tear the bottom out of their vehicles from the potholes.
If we pay for 12 bags of garbage to be removed a month, limited to three a week, does that mean if the garbage people miss a week, the town owes you three bags of garbage the following week?
Are the streets only to be cleaned one time in the spring?
Does it make sense to have to pay for town water when you are on a well of your own?
Can we not afford to keep the dump open five or six days a week?
I don’t blame the town workers for doing a job and following orders, but our tax dollars at work seem to be mismanaged for a vastly growing community like Sylvan.
Should we call this the town of Sylvan or the town of Sylvan Lake (emphasis on LAKE).
I wonder if these are statements other townspeople would agree with or am I just having a bad day?
Greg Fairbrother,
Sylvan Lake
Concerns about Lacombe County’s plans for Sylvan
Dear Editor,
Following are our comments to Lacombe County on the draft Sylvan Lake area structure plan.
We reside and farm on the SE 25-39-02-W5M and have several concerns regarding the proposed development around Sylvan Lake, some of which are:
• Where will the supply of fresh water come from to accommodate the projected amount of residents near and around Sylvan Lake? If groundwater is used, this could deplete the water in the lake very quickly, which is of great concern to us; and many of the local citizens.
• Two years is not a reasonable time period to see if any new development would adversely affect Sylvan Lake, it should last at least four or five years, at the minimum.
• Why is the area and density of development area 1 (which will be used to do the first study) so much smaller than the area and density in development area 2? This is not a true reflection of the impact of the larger development areas.
• Why is the density of the development proposed so much greater on the north side of Sylvan Lake in comparison to the south side?
• There are sufficient roadways in place, and we feel additional road connections would be counter-productive and totally unnecessary.
• More and more people are moving to Central Alberta and surrounding areas; they too will want to enjoy the current natural beauty of the lake without it being overdeveloped.
• We feel Lacombe County, the Town of Sylvan Lake and Red Deer County
Area Structure Plan, not just Lacombe County.
• Based on what we knew from work done elsewhere, Dr. David Schindler was quite outspoken about proposed developments on and around Sylvan Lake and predicted that the water quality would be greatly compromised. This should seriously be taken into account!!!
Please take our concerns into consideration when revising the Sylvan Lake Area Structure Plan.
Douglas and Sylvia Culshaw,
RR #1 Bentley
July 23, 2010
Invasion complete
Dear Editor,
I was riding the elevator to my third floor apartment today when the in-elevator telephone started to ring. I picked up the receiver and in a nano-second my emotions raced from alarm to relief to disgust as I listened to yet another telemarketing call!
Donna Stinson,
Sylvan Lake
We must do what is required to keep lake healthy
This letter was sent to Lacombe County in response to its open house and copied to Sylvan Lake News for publication.
RE: Draft Sylvan Lake Area Structure Plan - Stakeholder Meeting
First of all, let me thank you for the invitation to the meeting July 6th, 2010, and the opportunity to get a preview of the draft Sylvan lake Area Structure Plan, then the subsequent meeting held in Sylvan Lake on Saturday, July 9th, 2010.
In my opinion the “cluster” concept is excellent. As I pointed out in the meeting, summer villages sprang up decades ago, and they are all “clustered”. The Summer Village of Birchcliff actually has a “cluster” within the “cluster”.
I agree that the design and technology of developments today are far superior to those of decades past, however, I would like to list some of the logistics that were not addressed in the draft plan:
Fresh Water - As far back as I can remember, we in rural Alberta, have had a concern about the supply of safe, healthy fresh water. The wastewater commission states that the average outflow of wastewater in Sylvan Lake is 370 liters per day per person. I can only assume that at least 370 liters per day per person of consumption would be an appropriate number. Given your projection of over 8,000 housing units and increased population over 20,000 persons, I believe that the fresh water concern should be primary on this long range structure plan.
Wastewater has become a major project in Central Alberta, and it is my understanding that all the clusters must be tied into the line before development is allowed.
Storm water ponds - It would be my hope that within a few years, new technology will be available to cleanse storm water in a cost effective manner; thus storm water could be used to irrigate pasture and other farmlands.
Additional roadways - It was stated in the presentation that additional roadways would be constructed to “join the clusters” in an effort to protect ecological concerns. I believe this is completely counter-productive. More roadways disrupt the natural flow of nature, surface water flow, wildlife paths and promote more travel. This requires more fossil fuel which creates more air pollution. Perhaps it would be better to upgrade and pave some of the existing grid roads rather than constructing new roadways.
Boat Traffic - It was stated at the meeting that Sylvan Lake is a jewel. I could not agree more, and feel it is imperative for me to do whatever I can to protect this jewel so that my grandchildren and those that follow can also enjoy the beauty that I have known.
Based on what I know about some of the boat studies, there is no way to know for sure the tipping point of boat traffic on the lake. Boats are getting faster with more wake. The wake destroys the shoreline and disturbs fish and bird breeding habitats. Oil and gas residue pollute the water harming marine and plant life.
I do not pretend to have a magic answer, but we need to think of the best way to allow the most number of persons to use the lake. Perhaps we need to restrict the size of boats, horsepower of motors, or set up a “permit to use” system. At any rate, once we devise a system, that system will need to be closely monitored and enforced.
Governance of the clusters - You stated in your presentations that “ecology is easier to handle than people”. How do you measure the amount of energy required to handle either?
Any person who has served on council of a summer village can tell you that there are always “people” issues in their particular “cluster”. Persons who use their cluster home as a summer home come to the country to enjoy the country setting, and at the same time, expect the same type of services that they enjoy in the city. As a result, I believe the clusters must have well defined and enforceable bylaws, and the personnel available to enforce the bylaws.
In addition, the clusters will require the following services: fire protection, police protection, bylaw enforcement, garbage pick up, ambulance services, medical care, libraries.
Clusters integrating with the Agricultural Community - As at today’s date, the agricultural community is being challenged by the acreage dwellers with their use of quads and snowmobiles. It seems to be the opinion of those who move to the country from the city that any “open” lands, vis-à-vis agricultural lands, belong to “everybody”! Not so! Quadders rip up the fields in the summertime, and snowmobilers cut fences and sled over newly planted trees in the winter time.
Cluster developments would require bylaws and bylaw enforcers to ensure that the agricultural community is not under siege by new developments.
Agriculture - As I stated in the meeting, I do not believe agriculture is a huge threat to the health of the lake. I am not aware of any intensive livestock operations in the water shed, and I am sure that none will be approved for development in the future.
It would be my hope that the planners would acknowledge the agriculture community for adapting new, environmentally friendly practices. Less tillage provides more fiber in the soil, therefore less run-off during the spring or rain storms.
In closing, I would like to state that I am not opposed to development in the Sylvan Lake watershed. I know that lands will be developed. I believe it is our responsibility to ensure that developments provide a quality lifestyle to those who choose to move here to the watershed. Additionally, it is incumbent upon us to do whatever is required to protect the lake and keep it healthy.
Joyce Megson, Mayor,
Summer Village of Birchcliff
July 16, 2010
Lacombe County guilty of rushing
plan to beat provincial legislation
Dear Editor,
Thank you for your editorial last week encouraging all those who are concerned about Sylvan Lake and its future water quality to attend last Saturday’s open house concerning the city that Lacombe County is planning for the sensitive northwest end of the lake. The turn-out was larger than Lacombe County anticipated.
While Phil Dack, of Aecon, the county’s hired pitchman for this Area Structure Plan (ASP), did his best to hold his own with a boisterous, passionate and often angry crowd, he did little to explain the details of the supposed water quality concern Lacombe County states is so important.
In their ASP under Development Capacity (Section 2.2), Lacombe states that modern construction methods can eliminate significant sources of water quality contamination. They go on to state that ‘a serious challenge in managing the health of a lake is that a biological system may take a very long time to recover from damage’ (they do acknowledge a well known fact that Sylvan Lake has a water residency period approaching 100 years - what goes into the lake stays in the lake for this period of time before it is flushed out).
They assure us that the ‘best lake development practices’ from other jurisdictions were considered, yet did not provide references (Pine Lake comes to mind). In the same paragraph they say that ‘Sylvan Lake is such an important and unique provincial resource that it would be unreasonable and unjustified to refuse to allow development based on fears of possible ecosystem damage that have proved avoidable in many lakes throughout the world’!
So let me understand this - Sylvan Lake is so important and unique, it would be unreasonable to disallow development just because we may damage the ecosystem. We just have to employ best practices and all will be good! Yikes!!
The very next sentence says that ‘development around the lake should not be restricted or curtailed without clear and defensible scientific or other rationale’. Just who is to provide scientific or other rationale that the county will adhere to?
Keep in mind that Dr. David Schindler, of the University of Alberta, one of the world’s most imminent and renowned fresh water scientists was interviewed by CBC on the very subject of Sylvan Lake, its water quality and what 50 years of scientific evidence tells him will happen to this lake. Dr. Schindler was coined by the previous reeve of Lacombe County as ‘Chicken Little’ during this CBC interview.
Aecon, when asked, admitted they did not call on Dr. Schindler for his opinion on what very likely will happen to Sylvan Lake with such a planned build out. Maybe they knew they would not like the answer and it was best left unexplored.
Lacombe County is guilty of rushing through this ASP in order to beat the coming Alberta Land Use Framework legislation due this fall. This legislation is designed to oversee these municipalities that are ill-equipped to realize the risks or oversee the protection of a natural capital resource like Sylvan Lake.
Residents of Alberta need to voice their concerns loud and clear.
Michael Williamson,
Blissful Beach
July 9, 2010
Not running to ‘challenge’
Dear Editor,
Thank you very much for your article on the upcoming elections for the local summer village councils on July 24.
However, I would like to clear up any possible misunderstanding that I am running in Norglenwold to “challenge” the existing councilors.
As you noted, Toby Lampard has decided not to run again. I consequently decided to stand for election as I hope to make a positive contribution to the affairs of the summer village.
My family has enjoyed our property in Norglenwold for 99 years.
I would like to ensure that the quality of life and the environment are maintained for the generations who will follow.
Moreover, the ratepayers of Norglenwold face very high taxes. We need to take great care with all expenditures so as not to increase that burden.
Finally, there is a constant push to eliminate summer villages. I do not support that. The summer village councils are necessary to ensure a local voice and input.
Given the high calibre of people who are running in Norglenwold, an excellent council will be elected in July 24.
However, I would be honoured to be one of those selected to serve our community.
Michael Dawe,
Norglenwold
Use biggest joke of all for skate park
Dear Editor,
People are complaining about the slow completion of the new lakefront washrooms and the expanded park area down the road from them, but at least work is being done and progress made.
The biggest joke of all is the abandoned, empty, derelict corner lot with the see through fence on the prime showplace corner of main street and Lakeshore Drive. By comparison with this fiasco, which has been allowed to sit and decay for years without even the slightest signs of positive development, the washrooms and park area workers should all be given medals of accomplishment. Certainly these lakefront developments have been controversial and realistically good construction can drag on, but at least they are being followed through with.
A real and responsible accomplishment would be to deal with what the majority of people still consider to be the biggest joke of all and do something with the dumpy downtown corner lot that everyone wishes was not there. It will take some immediate firm and visionary action such as has been applied to the washroom and park area developments, but will remove what locals and visitors alike see as an eyesore.
Finally, I have heard many people suggesting that the empty corner lot could quickly be turned into either a simple open park space or the controversial skateboard area. It already has a see through security fence and the concrete base could be cleaned up by cutting away the protruding rebar and filling in the underground parking area below with sand for stability. What a visionary commitment that would be!
Craig Little,
Sylvan Lake
July 2, 2010
Thanks to councillors for all the work they do
Dear Editor,
We all too often hear a lot of the negative things that people feel our town council does and they never take the time to think of the positive things that go in the chambers of our town council meetings.
It was just last week that my father (Ted) and I did a presentation to council based on our Senior Men’s AAA team. After a long public hearing at the community centre our council returned to the town office and carried on with their regular business. I couldn’t believe how accommodating our council was. They heard every detail we had in our presentation to make sure they had all the necessary information.
Even before we presented they sat through a parking study that had been conducted and gave the engineers that were in attendance all the time they needed as well. Now to me that is a hard working council that is gathering all the necessary information before decisions on items that effect our town.
I read the letters to the editor all the time and our councillors and mayor never seem to get much or any credit for the time they commit to the town’s issues. We may not always agree with the direction they choose but if you’re not happy with those decisions then get involved with the democratic process don’t sit back read about something in the paper and then react to it.
I applaud the teens of our community that showed up at the public hearing and voiced their opinions. If we had that kind of passion and turn out for more items that affect our community we would all be helping shape our community vision for the future. After seeing that, I know I feel I need to be more involved in what’s happening in Sylvan Lake. I’ve been one of the guys sitting in the background and always wonder what’s going on and why decisions are made but I’ve never got off my butt to get involved.
I personally wanted to thank council for the work they put in and the time they spend helping shape our community. With elections around the corner I hope to see lots of candidates to pick from and I will make sure that I take part in the process to help our town’s future.
Jason Stephens,
Sylvan Lake
Wood smoke from fire pits dangerous, costly to health system
Dear Editor,
Several studies have shown that Albertans are most concerned about industrial pollution. However, the most dangerous sources of pollution are closer to home — the fumes and noise from vehicles and the wood smoke from a neighbour’s fireplace or backyard fire pit. A dangerous source of pollution may even be inside your home as high levels of cancer causing compounds have been identified in homes with wood burning appliances.
The dangerous nature of wood smoke is a worldwide concern and has been since historical times. Had Albertans been told this, most would have installed natural gas fireplaces and bought propane firepits.
Both wood and tobacco are cellulose-based plant materials and their combustion products are almost identical, as are the diseases they cause. For an overview of the health implications of breathing wood smoke, one only has to read the health warnings on cigarette packages or for more information log on to www.burningissues.org.
In Britain, the deaths of 4,000 Londoners from fireplace smoke in only five days in 1952 was the catalyst for their smoke free towns and cities program. Also, politicians were very much aware that the cost of treating smoke-related diseases could cripple their recently introduced “free” health care program. Paying homeowners to convert their fireplaces from burning dirty fuels, such as wood or coal, to clean burning natural gas was expensive, but the costs were soon recovered in terms of reduced health care costs.
Remarkably, in North America, wood burning has enjoyed a revival without adequate studies of the health implications. However in the United States with Universal Health Care on the horizon, the cost of treating the smoke diseases has come into sharper focus. In the San Francisco Bay area alone, with only 10 per cent of the homes burning wood to some degree, the cost of treating smoke-related diseases is estimated at $1 million annually. Breaking down the statistics even further, one fireplace burning wood for one evening is estimated to cost the health care system $40. Remarkably, there are no Canadian estimates of the health implications of urban wood burning.
Data from New Zealand is particularly troubling. Their wood and coal burning appliances have much lower annual emissions than Canadian models, yet emission from each appliance is estimated to cost the health care system $2,700 annually to treat smoke diseases.
The reason so many urban centres gravitate into wood and fire pollution situations is that emissions from wood burning appliances expose neighbours to high levels of dangerous chemicals, but the smoke and chemicals dissipate before reaching an air quality monitoring station. Eventually, as more residents burn wood, emissions finally reach a monitoring station and air quality standards are exceeded; politicians then decide that so many residents (voters) are now burning wood it is too political to do anything.
Dozens of Canadian and American towns and cities have gone down this road and there are more every year. It will take a future generation that cares for the urban environment for these centres to be, once again, healthy places in which to live.
For a cleaner, healthier environment, all that is needed is to contact the world’s more environmentally-conscious urban centres and borrow their tried and tested clean air initiatives. The worst route any town can take is to rely on Canada’s new Air Quality Health Index.
Alan Smith,
Red Deer
Alan Smith is a former member of the Urban Environment Study Group of the Environment Council of Alberta.
Show positive character and manners
Dear Editor,
After spending a number of years in the call centre industry I’ve come to notice an ever growing “culture of disconnect”. Is this due to a critical failure in our education system, the daily barrage of negative information or simply a collective laziness of character, kindness or manners?
The disrespect shown between humans is growing as we continue to remove ourselves from each other with our ever expanding digital communication. Yet people continue to move closer to each other by migrating to urban centers while perceiving cultural differences as ignorance or stupidity.
Rudeness is becoming commonplace in this country as we grow impatient with ourselves and take our frustrations out on those around us.
Please, before you pick up the phone and start yelling at “the voice on the other end”, take a moment to assess your situation, formulate your concerns in an understandable way and perhaps try “asking for assistance” instead of being a jackass! Reality shows that promote this type of behaviour are just that — scripted, ridiculous REALITY SHOWS!
Be kind! Show your positive character and manners in every interaction of every day and I promise you your life will be so much healthier, happier and wonderful! Be Canadian!
And to the disgraceful companies that treat your customer service staff like disposable robots and your customers as nothing more than ATMs, smarten up! Don’t be such greedy jackasses!
Jeff Leggat,
Burnaby, B.C.
June 25, 2010
Opposed to skateboard park at Four Seasons location
Dear Editor,
I am writing this letter in opposition to one of the proposed skateboard park locations — specifically, the Four Seasons Park option which was discussed at June 14th’s council meeting and public hearing.
Like many others at the meeting, I am not opposed to the construction of a skate park in the Town of Sylvan Lake. I appreciate that there are many people who would utilize the facility and that it could potentially be a destination for people outside of our community. I also want to be clear that I don’t believe skaters to be inherently bad people — I know that the majority will look after the facility and treat it, and the surrounding areas, with respect. My issue is with the location and, insomuch as it affects my property, with the minority who will abuse the area.
As a homeowner whose property backs onto the proposed location I have both personal and economic objections with the Four Seasons site (and my neighbours share these concerns). I won’t spend time expanding on these because I feel that they are obvious for anyone who has been surprised by unexpected changes that have happened around their property, and easily imagined by those who have not. This location is not viable for other reasons.
First and foremost, the proposed location lacks adequate sight lines from passing roads. In addition to the obvious security concern (not necessarily from unruly boarders, but from those who use it as a hangout), poor sight lines also present a safety issue for the park users should they be hurt or injured. Essentially, we would have an unsupervised extreme sport complex with limited access for emergency vehicles and no effective means to monitor it.
The skateboarders noted this concern at the public hearing and identified other characteristics that should be considered in the construction of the park. They were clear that they would prefer to be away from residential areas so that they would not have to worry about disturbing homeowners (and vice versa), and they acknowledged that there is noise associated with skate parks.
One boarder pointed out that the area should be well-protected from the wind (another strike against this location as it is susceptible to prevailing winds. It is sheltered by homes on the east side only and we rarely have winds blow from the east. The area also gets dusty due to the maintenance of the ball diamonds in the park).
Finally, although this wasn’t mentioned at the meeting, the high water table in the area is a concern, particularly if the park will be built into the ground. It would be a shame if we built a facility there and then found out that it was not useable due to wind, dirt build up, or flooding.
Selection of the location needs to be done with care and with an eye for the future. Time spent by proponents of the skateboard park, town council, recreation department, skateboard park committee, and fundraising groups, need to bear results that are practical, sustainable, and acceptable to both the users of the facility and the neighbourhood within which it sits. Otherwise, it is a failure.
As the community grows, we find ourselves suddenly lacking recreational facilities. We have become more than just a bedroom community and we need free-use facilities that appeal to all of our residents and that attract visitors from out of town. Now may be a good time to look at the needs of our community and allocate more time and resources to long term recreational planning for citizens of all ages.
Requiring developers to set aside green spaces is nice, but it is not enough. In addition to the skateboard park, we could plan for more tennis courts (courts that don’t have an east/west orientation would be nice), water parks, horseshoe pitches, inline hockey/roller skating courts, outdoor basketball courts, lawn bowling … whatever suits the needs of the community. But any development should be well-planned and cohesive, with future growth and
needs in mind.
For this reason, I would question the removal of an established little league ball diamond (which is currently used) for any other purpose. Where will the kids play ball? Will we be looking for another location for a minor league baseball diamond two years from now?
I appreciate that the skateboard park has been a long time in the works and that the skateboarders want to get it going, but I worry that expediency and budget concerns will compromise the viability and enjoyment of this facility. In the long run, poor planning and band-aid solutions will only cost the community more.
Rob Rolston,
Sylvan Lake
Writer fears delay in finding new location
Dear Editor,
New Skatepark? Not in my backyard!
This was the sentiment from land owners at last night’s (June 14) “public hearing” in regards to Sylvan Lake’s new skateboard and BMX facility. Person after person stood up and blasted town council for wanting to enhance the current green space at 47 Avenue and 52 Street.
The crowd was large, and diverse. My family and I sat behind an 8 year old skater and his friends, two rows up was a large group of youth in their early teens, behind me sat community youth leaders. Across the aisle were people ranging in age from 11 to 80. The youth showed up in large numbers and gave great respect to the public hearing process, applauding each person who spoke regardless of their stance. I am proud of them.
The same cannot be said of some others in the crowd. I was shocked and embarrassed when a concerned mother and long time resident, who suggested that some people would enjoy living near such a facility, was interrupted, scoffed at, and laughed at by those (roughly 40 adults) who disagreed with her. What a display.
The cries of the people were heard by council, who appropriately albeit sadly vowed a skatepark would not be built on the green space near H. J. Cody High School. The plan instead is to move forward with connecting the paved walking trails that are east and west of the location, with the small chance of a bench, or picnic table close by.
The questions from the skateboard and BMX community are: “If not there, then where?” and, “If not now, then when?” The skateboard association has been fighting for bigger and better facilities in Sylvan Lake for more than five years. Meanwhile, the skate park task force has been sent back to the drawing board to start again. With all the talk of a new skate park integrated with other recreational attractions, I can’t help but wonder how long this “new” process will take. I fear panels, hearings, focus groups, and studies will delay even further, a facility Sylvan Lake’s young and young at heart deserve, and have been waiting for for years.
Our mayor did however provide a light at the end of the tunnel, saying that there is no doubt that a new skatepark is being constructed in Sylvan Lake, the only question is location …
Let’s hope that tunnel is short.
Sean McIntyre,
Sylvan Lake
June 18, 2010
Fears completely wrong; proposed location prime place
Dear Editor:
After reading all of the negativity surrounding the proposed area for the new skate park, I have decided to voice my opinion about why it should be located on the C.P.R. The main feeling that I arrived at after reading the letters was a sense of fear.
Most of the writers seemed to be residents in or around the area proposed for the new skate park, and they are concerned about crime that is associated with skate parks. According to one concerned citizen, skate parks bring about noise, traffic, loud ghetto blasters, buying and use of drugs and alcohol, injuries, no set hours, no supervision, littering, need of policing, and devaluation of property. As a 17 year old kid who spends lots of time hanging out at the skate park and with the people at it, I would like to dismiss all of those statements.
First, skate parks bring about noise. By noise, they probably mean the intense sound of kids talking to each other. Or, lack there of. Take a walk down 50th when the skate park is really busy. I doubt you’ll even be able to hear the kids at the park. With the bit of distance from houses, trees, and the fact that it will be made out of concrete, it will be even quieter than the one we have now. Also, it will cut down on traffic because the kids won’t be skateboarding on the streets or driving around because they will be at the park.
I can’t remember the last time I saw a ghetto blaster. I think the last time I even heard that term was the 1990s. But they are highly impractical to bring to a skate park because there is nowhere to plug them in, and the batteries for them are way to expensive. In fact, if you actually went to the park you wouldn’t see any ghetto blasters but a bunch of kids with iPod headphones in their ears.
Drugs and alcohol? Teenagers may not be rocket scientists, but we are smarter than to deal with any of that stuff out in the open at a park where there are countless witnesses. I’ve never actually seen people drinking or getting high at skate parks, to be honest. People do that inside.
Setting hours at a skate park doesn’t really mean anything when there isn’t any crime going on there anyways. Same with supervision.
As far as littering, look at the current skate park. Put a garbage can there and you’ll notice that we’re responsible enough to put our garbage where it belongs. Again, you don’t need more police if there is no more crime, and if you know anything about economics the property value would actually go up. I would love to buy a house right next to a skate park.
People from Sylvan go all of the way up to Airdrie because of how much better their skate park is, and the same will happen with Sylvan. Believe it or not, more people will come here as tourists and might potentially even want to move in. A skate park is an asset to the town and will bring in revenue.
I’m a big believer of knowledge without mileage equals garbage. People give these stereotypes to teenagers but don’t actually go to the parks to really get to know them. If someone says that teenagers are bad or that skate parks breed crime but don’t actually go to find out, they are just listening to someone else’s opinion on it.
These are some of the smartest and best people around. Talk to any social worker or teacher who actually knows them and they will say the same thing. When you know the people I know, it gets really hard to paint people with that big broad brush that we tend to use. These fears are completely wrong, and the location for the park is in a prime position if you look at it from the perspective for a teen. It’s right by the school so something to do during lunch, right near iNCLINE and soon Anchor, and close to places to get something to eat like Mac’s store.
In closing, the gathering of teenagers actually cuts back crime, as shown through things like the youth rally on Friday, or any of the local concerts at iNCLINE. Not a lot of crime going on there.
Kevin Welch,
Sylvan Lake
Lacombe County may be to lake what BP was to Gulf
Dear Editor:
Thank you for the news article “Water key to Sylvan Lake’s future”. It is important for readers to understand why Mr. Sandford has urged the lake community to “work for the common good and to aim higher” than what simple self-interest has produced so far.
This is critical advice and governments at Sylvan Lake should act on it. Next month Lacombe County will be holding an open house to showcase a flawed plan to bring 20,000 people to “their” portion of the watershed in future years. They intend to accomplish this without lake community co-operation or support by acting alone and adopting an Area Structure Plan (ASP) that does not consider impacts from seven other lake municipalities. They will ignore cumulative effects from existing developments and they will not consider the environmental, economic, and social costs that will come due in the future.
Bob Sandford has warned our local governments to avoid over-development and all of the ugly consequences that will follow if they don’t (rotting algae, fish kills, and a dead lake).
Mr. Sandford doesn’t need a crystal ball to make the prediction of over-building and its consequences to Sylvan Lake. He can forecast it by observing the plans of Lacombe County. He can predict it by observing the fact that no municipal council is willing to challenge them on their “attack” on what remains of undeveloped land in the watershed — the portion that they consider as “theirs”.
Two months ago people living along the Gulf of Mexico were oblivious to the way that their lives were about to change; now they understand what was not so obvious before.
Lacombe County may be to Sylvan Lake what BP was to the Gulf, except that when our beach is closed it will be due to algae rather than oil.
The people of the Gulf should consider themselves lucky. Oil can be cleaned up, in our case, algae will be forever. Lacombe County’s public hearing will be held at the multiplex at 10 a.m. on July 10th. We should all attend.
Kent Williamson,
Blissful Beach
Shame on citizens of Sylvan
Dear Editor:
Shame on you citizens of Sylvan Lake for displaying a classic case of NIMBY! Having lived here for twenty plus years, I have to wonder if it was a hockey rink or a playground for children under the age of eight if there would have been such an uproar and negative reaction.
I have heard people complain that all the older kids do is hang out, swear and do drugs, and when you are offered a safe, healthy and obviously wanted and needed facility in the town to address some of these concerns you turn thumbs down.
The young folks were respectful of all speakers, well prepared, and passionate about their cause only to be met with indifference and in some cases outright rudeness by the naysayers. The next time you complain about young folks being apathetic about the political process and unwilling to participate or become involved in any way in their communities, think back to the reception they received at this one sided open house and maybe you will understand why.
The rhetoric and hyperbole around this initiative by those opposed to the proposed skate park was a sad display indeed.
To those of you who had the courage and the courtesy to show up and support this initiative in such a respectful manner — I salute you! To those who went into this “consultative process” with your eyes closed and minds made up and your NOT IN My BACK YARD agenda — SHAME ON YOU!!
Gerry McIntyre,
Sylvan Lake
Skateboarding gets kids active
Dear Editor:
I am a skateboard and snowboard store manager in Red Deer who lived in Sylvan for many years. My parents still live there, as do my brother and his wife. I feel that in this discussion about the proposed skateboard park in Sylvan there has been little defense for our skateboarders from the adults who respect and support them.
While the location may be something that still needs to be discussed, the fact that a bigger, better skatepark should be built is not. Mr. Cliff Watt made a great suggestion in saying that the park should be near the other rec. facilities. That’s how it is in Red Deer – next to an arena and tennis court. This should satisfy the people who are against the current location, though I doubt that it is just the location most of them oppose.
In Pat Ammeter’s letter to the editor she expressed a few concerns that I’m sure are shared by a number of residents but are without merit. While there are certainly a number of skateboarders who smoke marijuana, drink beer and litter, there are as big a number of hockey players, lacrosse players, band kids, mountain bikers and adults who do the same. If anything, a public park that encourages physical activity curbs this type of behavior.
It is a sadly common misconception that our skateboarders are trouble makers. In my years working in this industry I’ve had the pleasure of seeing a number of skateboarders grow up to be high functioning, contributing, adult members of society. A specific group of them has gone on to organize numerous trips to third world countries where they encourage the sport and contribute financially and physically to improving the lives of under-privileged kids there. Another is a graphic designer in Calgary. One owns an extremely successful exteriors company. These same kids who grew up at the downtown skate park in Red Deer are homeowners, taxpayers, trades people, and college graduates.
The current skate park in Sylvan is located right next to the police station, so if – as Ms. Ammeter suggests – it is already a high-
crime area, who is in fact to blame? The hundreds of kids who legitimately use the park to participate in their preferred sport, or the police officers who don’t look up during the walk from their cars to the office?
I would also like to respond directly to something Ms. Ammeter said at the end of her letter that I fear may be a belief held by too many residents of Sylvan Lake: “If you think that we must have an expensive skateboard park for the small segment of society that uses it …”
Our store has been in business for 18 years. In the past 10 years we have quadrupled in size, literally, as well as witnessed the openings of four other skate shops in Red Deer and two in Sylvan Lake. That’s considerably more than a “small segment of society” especially compared to the growth in the “nature walk” community that would use the expensive nature path. And if you factor in the bikes and inline skates that would surely use the park I’m pretty sure you will find yourself quickly outnumbered. Do we oppose that project? Absolutely not. But we demand that you respect our right to use public space as well.
A bigger, better skatepark is good for tourism (see Airdrie, a town with no other draw, but kids from all over Alberta go there to skate their park), good for the economy (ask Sean at iNCLINE how much his business has grown, how many people he employs, how many trades people he’s hired in the last few years and how much he pays in taxes) and good for our youth.
Skateboarding is a gateway sport that gets kids interested in being active, independent and part of a community of some of the most loyal people you will ever meet.
Jasmine Nelson,
Red Deer
Skate park important to many people
Dear Editor:
I’m writing this letter to let you know how important building a skate park in Sylvan Lake is to our family and many others.
My son rides his BMX and skateboard everyday at Incline Industries here in Sylvan Lake. I appreciate the staff and all of the people there for treating him so well and being great role models.
He’s 10 years old and soon will be introduced to things I’d rather him not be into and without the love of riding he may be persuaded. I’ve seen many kids without something productive to do out of pure boredom turn down the wrong path leading to future problems and I know that this skate park will be one more tool into leading our children down the right path.
Many of you out there do not have children in that age group or children at all but remember there are lots of them in our community. Please let our kids be happy and healthy and enjoy the benefits that this skate park will bring. I hope you will do the right thing and make it happen for the people in this community, it will touch the lives of many kids including mine.
Amy Larsen,
Sylvan Lake
June 11, 2010
Make right decision on ‘state of the art monster’
Dear Editor:
(The following was sent to mayor and council regarding the skate park and proposed bylaw 1549-2010)
There is an old saying which says, “When you snooze you lose.” We have been snoozing! It has been drawn to our attention that there is considerable concern over the proposed location of the new skateboard park in our area. It seems that the concerned residents, who have approached us, have more knowledge on skateboard parks than we do. Yes, it was time for us to wake up and become informed.
Not having children of the age who use these parks, we listened to our neighbours’ concerns. Here are some of their very heated responses.
First and foremost, “there is no way that a skateboard park should be that close to a residential area.” Most skateboard parks in other towns and cities are away from the residential areas; for example Cochrane and Olds as can be seen on the websites. We were led to believe they were in residential areas of the town. Not true. There are many reasons for concern about skateboard parks in general, no matter where it is built. Check for yourself about some of the skateboard parks in our area. Some of these other concerns are as follows: excessive noise; too much traffic of every kind, whether on foot, skateboard or vehicle; loud drumming ghetto blasters; bullying, the use and selling of illegal drugs and alcohol; all kinds of injuries which will tax the already overloaded health care system; no set hours; no supervision; vandalism problems; excessive littering; need of extra policing; devaluation of their property; and the list goes on. So, are these people making this up, or are these valid causes for concern? Yes, they are very valid.
Oh yes, I can’t forget to remind this council, that just a few years ago, at a town meeting, over 200 people protested the sale of this property to commercial developers, but instead, they unanimously voted to have the town purchase the CP area and designate it as a permanent public “green space”.
What does that mean? I understand that the people in town seem to understand that, but why doesn’t the council understand what that means? Or did they think it meant, just until the next council decides to rezone it so development can happen. What part of this land will be chosen next for development? If this goes ahead, we are setting a precedent for future development. Surely there is an area somewhere close to the other recreational facilities or in the industrial area, away from the residential area, that would be much more suitable.
Some people think that being close to the school and the RCMP building will help with monitoring the area, plus the residents could help watch … really … are we supposed to stand out on the trail to watch what is going on over there 24/7? If people think that one would be nervous walking that area now, as someone has suggested, what do you think it would be like with a bunch of kids who may possibly be drunk or stoned who are hanging around or smoking pot in the trees just behind our homes? (They already go there.) I am told that the present skateboard park, which is next to the police station, right in line with the watchful eye of the police, is a place where drugs are bought and sold on a regular basis. Is that true?
I must mention H. J. Cody School as well. It has a sign stating that it is a “drug free zone”. I would like to ask the students who attend there, if this is true. What a perfect side-by-side setup for illegal activity amongst our precious, and most impressionable, members of society; our youth and especially the preteens.
Keep in mind it is not the skateboard park that is the problem, it is the activities that go hand in hand with unsupervised skate parks. Why do you think campgrounds are having so many problems, and now we have gated parks with attendants who check the grounds all night? The few spoil it for the majority. Are all the skateboard kids bad? Absolutely not!!!
Mulling all this over in my mind as to what the best solution could be, I consulted Google for a few ideas.
(Edited due to space constraints) - check the following websites for details.
(http://www.nj.com/cumberland/index.ssf/2010/04/bridgeton_resident_fears_new_s.html)
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2526087/)
(http://theskateboardmag.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=49&page=3)
Getting close to home, this is from a Leduc web page. (http://www.leducrep.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2596711)
Let’s get closer to home. Check out Ponoka and a few others for yourself. An early morning eyewitness report from just last week, after an all-nighter at the Red Deer skate park, revealed exactly what went on. It was almost like a hurricane hit; alcohol cans and bottles, garbage from all sorts of snack food, and even a bunch of rocks were scattered around and on the skateboard. The last “not-to-alert” skateboarder left as the clean-up committee arrived early in the morning.
Now let’s bring it right to home. One of our neighbors said that she won’t let her kids go to the skateboard park here in Sylvan Lake because her concerns are much the same as the ones above. What happens when little kids don’t go along with dictates of the older ones? They get bullied, so it is no longer safe for them.
Now, that I am somewhat awake on this issue, I would like the council to wake up as well. If you think that we must have an expensive skateboard park for the small segment of society that uses it, then please make the right decisions as to the operation of this “state of the art monster” or you will be forced to shut it down like some of the other towns have done. Make sure you listen to the public, who, by the way, put you in there to speak for the residents and not to promote your own ideas when we are half asleep or miss the pancake breakfast.
Pat Ammeter,
Sylvan Lake
Skateboard park should be near other rec. facilities
Dear Editor:
A rezoning public meeting on such a divisive issue as the green space should be separate from any other matter.
I see this council is up to their old tricks again by holding a public hearing regarding the rezoning of the green space known as the old C. P. R. right of way along with a meeting regarding a proposed skateboard park.
Holy cow!!! guess who is going to fill the council chambers? The supporters of the skateboard park will be out in mass to support their cause, and rightfully so, and by doing so will ensure that council gets their wish and the rezoning of the area will proceed. Council knows the majority of the people speaking will support the rezoning of the area so the skateboard park can proceed even if this is not in the best interests of residents or for that matter the skateboarders. Regardless of past petitions, public meetings, etc. when the councillors were told that development per se is not acceptable on the green space, they will proceed anyway because they will claim the public has spoken.
I seem to remember a public meeting regarding the location of the police station when a motion was made by one of the councillors that this area should be zoned so that development could never take place and we would not have to have these discussions ever again. The mayor completely ignored the proposal so we knew that the question of rezoning to allow development would come up again and again.
I agree with Mr. Dills’ idea that a different zoning category should be explored for this area. I cannot support the present suggestion by council to rezone the area to PF as a lot of development can be done under this zoning (i.e the new fire hall can fall under this zoning).
This is a crown jewel of the town and should be left for the enjoyment of all.
I have no problem with a skateboard park as such, but the proposed area is the wrong place for it. It should be in Four Seasons Park with other rec. facilities. After all, you are looking at a 17,000 square foot facility which is bigger than three average sized house lots. At Four Seasons a lot of the necessary amenities and infrastructure are in place, bathrooms, parking, etc.
I do not live even close to the areas mentioned so have no axe to grind but I have visited a lot of towns, that have these facilities and without exception they are placed in or around present rec. facilities or industrial settings and not on public green spaces or natural areas. Ask any professional risk manager and they will tell you that a facility of this type should not be built anywhere near a residential
area due to possible conflicts with residents.
A question to town councillors: Has the Municipal Government Act been taken into consideration in the proposed placement of the skateboard park? I am talking about a facility being built which could negatively affect the surrounding residents which of course could give rise to yet another lawsuit for compensation.
Regardless of the majority of the population’s opinion, this council will do as they please and will not listen to anyone. Lakeshore Drive and Centennial Park are prime examples of not listening.
Cliff Watt,
Sylvan Lake
Leave wildlife corridor
Dear Editor:
Here we go again! A lovely piece of land in Sylvan Lake that runs just south of 47th Avenue and runs through the middle of Fox Run is again under the scrutiny of “hungry eyes’.
This distresses me and I hope others, too, to no end. There is just so much to lose, nicely maintained field, lovely stands of trees, butterflys, wildflowers, choke cherries, raspberries, strawberries, saskatoons and all manner of creatures to say nothing of the peace one feels while walking one’s dogs and cats along this route.
This land is currently classified as an ‘Urban Reserve District’ (UR), Land Use Bylaw No. 1307/2003. The council of the Town of Sylvan Lake wants to amend this classification to a ‘Public Facility District’ (PF), Bylaw 1549/2010. I am told that they only plan to put in a skateboard park, but I suspect that it is just the beginning.
Sylvan Lake is spreading out in all directions in a big way and every community of any size should consider a ‘wildlife highway corridor’, be in place. It is in place now, please, have a heart and leave this piece of natural land the way it is.
Maureen Boswell
and neighbours,
Sylvan Lake
Respect the wishes of over 1,000 people
Dear Editor:
I agree that the youth of Sylvan Lake should have a skateboard park, that is not an issue. But not on the green space at 47th Avenue, that is an issue.
I cannot blame them for being attracted to this area; it is wonderful and it will be even better when the trail is finished. But, would it not be fair that this area should be retained as recreational trail for those citizens who do not wish to join in the hustle and bustle of an active park environment. The trail system will still be available for everyone to use, including skateboard riders going to and from their skateboard park. Take a look west of Westview Drive and east of 45th Avenue and see what a great job the town has done there.
Let me remind those who may have forgotten, or possibly never knew, how the CPR land came to remain undeveloped.
In 1970 or 1980, CPR closed the railway and the land was unofficially used for recreational purposes. The town indicated that it wished to purchase this land for a trail. June 2004 a developer presented a plan to develop the CPR land; it was supported by the council of the day. Following many small group meetings, two public meetings were held at the community center because council chambers were too small as hundreds of residents attended both meetings.
At the first information meeting the developer said that he was going to develop whether we liked it or not; both he and the council were given our opinions.
At the council meeting, where he was expected to apply for planning permission, he stood up and very clearly said words to the effect “I wish to withdraw my application, I apologize but I had no idea of the depth of feeling the citizens of this community had for the trail, I step aside”. We thought we had won.
October 2004 the municipal elections were held and only the mayor and one councillor were re-elected. My memory tells me that each successful candidate supported the green space. Soon after that the town purchased the land from CPR.
Since then, on several occasions, the town has tried to develop the green space between Westview Drive and main street. Every time the citizens of Sylvan Lake have given a very loud “NO”. I accept that a tick sheet indicated that the community wanted it to be used for recreational use, at that time I was a member of the recreation board and I supported it. However, was that not for a water park and picnic tables. I cannot agree that this survey supported the concept of a skateboard park or other active pastimes.
In 2008 the town planned to build the new police station here. Once again the citizens said “NO”. More than 1,000 citizens of Sylvan Lake signed a petition to stop this and any future development of the CPR trail.
Am I wrong or is the opinion and the effort that so many citizens put in to protect this area, for the benefit of future generations, being ignored? If the citizens of 2004 had not stood up to be counted, over 240 dwellings, including single family houses, row houses and condos would have been built there and the skateboard group would not have had this as an option. Morally, I believe it was wrong for the town to open up old wounds by offering this area as an option.
I respectfully ask the skateboard park group to respect the wishes of over 1,000 citizens who worked so hard in the past to preserve this area for future generations and withdraw their interest in the green space.
If the group decides to proceed, I respectfully ask that council respect the wishes of over 1,000 citizens of Sylvan Lake and direct the skateboard park to be built either at Four Seasons Park or one of the other locations.
I also ask the citizens of Sylvan Lake to come to the town council meeting at 5:30 Monday (14th June) where a decision on the future of the CPR trail is being made.
John Walsh,
Sylvan Lake
Thanks to good Samaritans
Dear Editor:
I would like to send a big thank you to the good Samaritans who were responsible for finding my purse and returning it to me with all my belongings and money untouched.
Last Thursday (June 3) I left my purse and wallet in a shopping cart at Parkland Mall before climbing on the seniors’ bus to head back to Sylvan Lake. It was left on the bench outside Sunshine Family Restaurant, near the jewellers, where we waited for the bus and picked up by someone from Peoples Jewellers.
My wallet had a number of important cards and personal information documents, as well as money, inside. Later that evening I received a phone call from an employee at Peoples Jewellers notifying me that they had found my purse and would keep it until I could retrieve it in the morning.
On Friday I visited Peoples Jewellers to find that the contents of my purse and wallet had been untouched.
I would like to send a big thank you to the honest people who found my purse and to staff at Peoples Jewellers for returning it to me.
Kay Resvick,
Sylvan Lake
Nine year old protesting
Dear Editor:
My name is Keira Ostrosser. I may be only nine but I hope this will make a difference.
I’m wondering first off why we’re cutting down the trees — beautiful trees — by Centennial Park (or the red playground) for a road. When the road’s done the people who live there will be mad. I’m a citizen of Sylvan Lake, so I know.
Second off, what are those HUGE buildings by the lake. It may seem like all this will attract tourists. But I think it will repel them. We’re famous for our lake, not a huge bathroom. The people at Big Moo won’t be able to see the lake.
I’m just wondering why we’re doing this. And I’m protesting. Hope this makes a difference.
Keira Ostrosser,
Sylvan Lake
Editor’s Note: An original of this letter was hand delivered to mayor Susan Samson and the author requested it be published.
Writer pleads with drivers to slow down
Dear Editor:
I am writing this letter of concern about our morning commuters, wishing to stress to ALL drivers to slow down. This isn’t the first time I have witnessed something like this but it is the first time I am speaking out about it!
I was turning left onto 44th Street by Sylvan Lake Veterinary Clinic, Tuesday. I had stopped to let a little girl who was waiting patiently to cross at the crosswalk. (She was obviously on her way to school.) As I watched her step slowly into the street looking for oncoming traffic, two individuals in SUVs passed on my right side (which I’d like to mention isn’t even a lane until you get closer to the fire hall!). These two vehicles were not moving slowly either. How my heart instantly sank as I saw this child barely jump back to miss this danger. You would think that would be the end of my story but the topper was the third SUV headed in the opposite direction that just about didn’t stop as the little girl was half way across that side of the road. What where these people thinking, or should I ask doing, to not notice her? Were they too worried about being late that they figured she should give them the right of way? As far as I know pedestrians have the right of way!
I have many times allowed my children to walk home from school with hesitation and worry about our busy roads. After witnessing this, how cautious this little girl was and how careless these drivers were I will now second guess allowing them to do this.
I couldn’t live with myself if my child did not come home to me and I guarantee the outcome of a seven year old and SUV would not be a good one!
I am just wondering who, in their heart, could live with themselves if they seriously hurt or killed another person’s child?
Summer is here, children are playing and not always paying as much attention as this little girl was so PLEASE remember to slow down, pay attention while you are driving, and remember the speed limit is 40 km in town, 30 km at playground zones and just because someone is stopped to turn left doesn’t make it legal to pass on the right side. The consequence is just not worth it!
Alexis Tucker,
Sylvan Lake
June 4, 2010
Hope councillors will act to protect health of all citizens
Dear Editor:
re: ‘Smoking ban doesn’t eliminate the problem’, May 14, 2010 edition
The members of Central Alberta Tobacco Reduction Action Coalition (CATRAC) would like to respond.
Carson Papke claims that efforts to protect the majority of Albertans from the harmful effects of second hand smoke and to protect the environment from the mounting piles of cigarette butt litter that would result from banning smoking in parks and playgrounds should be abandoned because laws would not eliminate the problem. Can Mr. Papke produce irrefutable evidence that any law, even ones for murder, have ever eliminated the problem they were created to address?
The arguments against such laws are the same ones that are always trotted out when evidence shows that action needs to be taken to reduce smoking in public places — the legality of the product, problems with enforcement and smokers’ rights.
The evidence is clear about the magnitude of the cigarette butt litter problem not only at Sylvan Lake, but across the country, and the litter problem is growing. The Great Canadian Shoreline Cleanup reported over 200,000 butts collected on beaches in 2005. In 2009 that number grew to almost 370,000 which is significant in the extreme and a big enough reason to take immediate action. Evidence indicates that many people who smoke do not recognize that cigarette butts do not biodegrade.
Public awareness and education is a big piece leading up to the smoking restrictions CATRAC has requested in Sylvan Lake. When people know better they are able to make better choices.
Alcohol is a legal substance. There are laws in place prohibiting drinking in public. If law enforcement is able to police public liquor law violations it seems that enforcement of smoking restrictions would also be possible. Legislation sets a standard of behaviour for people and an expectation to follow. That helps make it easier for all of us to expect and ask from those who flaunt the rules to do the right thing.
Canadians have rights as defined by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Check out the document. There is no right to smoke. A person’s ‘right’ to smoke as and where they choose ends where other’s rights to safety and health are compromised.
Ever found yourself downwind or next to someone smoking outside? Stating the obvious; the closer you are to someone smoking in an outdoor setting the more concentrated your exposure.
Children go to places frequented by adults, like ball diamonds, markets, walking paths and the beach. They deserve to be protected in those places as well as the playgrounds they frequent. The issue is to protect people from exposure to a substance that has no safe level of exposure.
Evidence has shown that the majority of people, over 85 per cent by the way, in Alberta follow the rules. Approximately 20 per cent of Albertans smoke. Most are considerate of the impact their smoking has on others. So we are not talking big enforcement numbers here. Often laws are made to address problems caused by a small number of people.
CATRAC is concerned that people who are addicted to tobacco may feel uncomfortable about restricting smoking in more places. There are provincial programs and supports already in place under Alberta Health Services to assist people who want to reduce or eliminate their dependence on tobacco products.
Other jurisdictions that have enacted comprehensive smoking bylaws have likewise had to navigate through misinformation campaigns. We hope Sylvan Lake councillors and the public are not fooled by misinformation being spread in the community and will act to protect the health of all citizens.
Central Alberta Tobacco Reduction Action Coalition is a group of volunteer members. Our membership is representative of ordinary people from a variety of walks of life including nurses, pharmacists, health agency representatives, teachers, fitness instructors, young adults still in school and retired persons. Our only vested interest is in protecting the health of people in our communities and in stating the truth about the dangers of tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure.
Juan Herrera,
CATRAC Member,
Red Deer
Wrong location for skate park; what we have in trail too valuable to lose
Dear Editor:
I write with regard to the proposed location of the skateboard/BMX park on the CPR green space, north of H. J. Cody High School. Let me say, in principle, I think that a skateboard park/BMX facility, as recommended by its hard working supporters, would be an asset for the youth of Sylvan Lake. It would be far better than their present facility.
However, would this be the correct location for such a venture? Whether it is tucked away from view in the trees or in full view of 47th Avenue, I have yet to be convinced that it would be.
This is not a case of nimbyism. I live probably 0.5km from this location; it is more a case of recognizing, that as one moves through the stages of life, your priorities change. What a group of enthusiastic skateboarder/BMX riders enjoy now, may not be to their liking in the future.
Throughout its entire length, the CPR green space is, in my and others’ opinions, an area unique to the Town of Sylvan Lake, where residents and visitors alike can enjoy a certain degree of peace, solitude and tranquility. They can enjoy what nature has to offer as the trail passes through the centre of town, from Hwy. 20 to 60th Street. I do agree that a certain amount of formal care of the area is necessary, for safety reasons. Should it be left natural? Probably not. Conversely, should it be treated as a conventional recreational park? Hmm, I do not think so.
My home backs onto part of the trail, situated between Westview Drive and 60th Street. Before the trail was surfaced, I wondered if it’s presence may have an adverse effect on the peaceful existence that we enjoyed. My concerns have proven to be unfounded. Throughout daylight hours there is rarely a time that pedestrians, some with prams, dog walkers, cyclists, runners and indeed skateboarders do not pass by; people of all ages. I can honestly say that the atmosphere is even more serene now, than it was before the surfacing of the trail took place. We are regularly visited by a small herd of deer and many types of wildlife. I believe that I am fortunate to have this area as part of my immediate neighbourhood and to be able to walk the trail from east to west and enjoy the same atmosphere through its entirety. However, the trail is not there just for those who are fortunate enough to live along side it, but it is there for all residents of Sylvan Lake and visitors alike to enjoy.
The proposal to build the skateboard/BMX park on this trail, should it be passed, I respectfully suggest would be a mistake and totally alien to what residents now enjoy and have gotten used to. Also, as the surfaced trail is extended and the area developed, it is what they should enjoy in the future.
We do have, as one of the suggested locations, “Four Seasons Park” and having given this much consideration I am convinced it would be a more suitable location for the skateboard/BMX facility.
My reasons for suggesting Four Seasons Park are as follows:
1. It is already an established recreational park, with all the necessary infrastructure
in place. Including washrooms and parking for vehicles. Cost less to develop.
2. I suggest, that at some point in time there will be competitions organized for the enthusiasts and once again there are facilities already in place at Four Seasons Park to accommodate such an event.
3. The community centre is there, much of the time with adults in attendance, who should be able to help in the event of an accident.
4. To protect and preserve what the community already has in the uniqueness of the CPR Trail. What we have in this trail is far too valuable for Sylvan Lake to lose.
John Walsh,
Sylvan Lake
Impressed by response
Dear Editor:
I came home from work on Wednesday, May 26, and noticed that my husband and I had forgotten to put our garbage out for the week (thinking it was Tuesday which was our mistake). I called the public works office to see how late the transfer station was open so that I could take my garbage there.
The town employee I spoke to, Kerry, was so helpful. I explained our mixup and she told me that if I could get my garbage ready in 15 minutes, that she would send a driver to pick it up. Wow!!!
I was very happy and impressed with the quick response by both Kerry and the driver and I want to give them BOTH A BIG THANK YOU!!!
I am so proud to call Sylvan Lake my home for the last 31 years. We have always had great people working for the town and these two employees are one of the reasons why. They didn’t have to go out of their way, but they did. Your extra work is appreciated and we hope that your supervisors realize the great job that you are doing.
Karen Johnson,
Sylvan Lake
May 28, 2010
Another summer looking at eyesore
Dear Editor:
It has now been a year since I last wrote the paper complaining about the disgrace located on the site of the old Sylvan Lake Hotel, and nothing has happened.
Well, that’s not technically true – the weeds have grown taller, the exposed rebar has gotten rustier, and the town has moved along in its plan to spend more than $25 million to redevelop the lakefront area of our town. In the very middle of this redevelopment, we will have same monument to incompetence and disdain for the citizens of Sylvan Lake that we’ve had for the last eight years.
Let’s not forget the other gift that 1118980 Alberta Ltd., the owner of that property, gave to Sylvan Lake residents – legal bills that must be paid from the town’s tax base.
When town administration finally tried to force action last year to remedy the dangerous and unsightly property under Section 546 of the Municipal Government Act, the property owner immediately filed a legal challenge based primarily on a technicality – that the town’s Director of Planning and Development had told town council what he was planning on doing.
We should take a moment to pass on a big thank you to the owners of 1118980 Alberta Ltd., as identified by Steve Dills in the August 28, 2009 edition of the Sylvan Lake News. Thank you to Bonnie Bredo, Blair Goranson Professional Corporation, Bryce Chapman, Anna & Douglas Simmonds, Douglas Urness & Sandra Surbey, Dr. Robert Furness Professional Corporation, Jean & William Renchki, Raymond R. Comeau Professional Corporation, Wetaskiwin Veterinary Hospital Ltd., and Gordon & Brenda Neil. You’ve done a wonderful job destroying a significant piece of the town’s history while having no feasible plan of what to do at that site, and you’ve managed to do it while costing the town and its taxpayers both pride and money.
I read in last week’s town council meeting minutes that, in a split vote, council has decided to suspend legal action pending documentation from this wonderful corporate citizen on an engineering report regarding the parking structure, a development plan for the site (again), and a detailed beautification plan.
All this information is supposed to be delivered by July, so it’s probably a fair bet that we’ll get to spend another summer looking at this eyesore. Is it too much to hope that we will actually start to see some progress on this very visible corner of our town, or will we be subjected to even more delay and disrespect from this company and its principals?
Gavin Fick,
Calgary/Sylvan Lake
Great work on Grease
Dear Editor:
Grease is the word! My family and I had the honour of attending the play Grease, put on by H. J. Cody students and we were wowed!
Thanks for such great show — it is amazing to think of all the work and preparation that went into putting it all together.
Having the car come out from under the stage was awesome! Keep up the good work HJ Cody — we look forward to your next performance.
Tami Theriault,
Sylvan Lake
Firefighters are heroes; it could have been much worse
Dear Editor:
Yesterday I walked the street where the horrific fire took place. I can only imagine how devastated each and every person affected must feel.
After looking, reacting and processing what I saw up close, I was in awe at what did in fact happen as opposed to what COULD have happened. If not for the expertise and experience of our fire department, the whole block could have gone up in smoke, and perhaps even human casualty could have occurred. The damage, although devastating to many, could have been 10 times worse. They did their job. THEY PUT OUT THE FIRE! 36 Fire Fighters PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE for the victims of this tragedy.
Yet people complain and blame the fire department for its “long” response time, which IN FACT was 9 minutes, despite the fact that these professionally trained and dedicated individuals must instantly respond from their jobs, homes or activities and rush to the fire hall, jump into their gear, get the trucks going and then fight traffic consisting of citizens trying to catch a bird’s eye view of the scene. All this took NINE minutes … a lifetime to those who were worst affected … but only two minutes longer than a full time city crew.
These men and women are, quite simply, HEROES.
The person who walked with me on the street of the fire, who felt so much compassion for the victims, yet was proud of her own efforts to avert further tragedy, was a Sylvan Lake volunteer firefighter … my daughter … MY hero.
Each and every day she and her comrades are more than willing to put their lives on the line for the safety and well being of every single citizen in this community. Think long and hard about that. As a mother of a fire fighter, I think about it every single day.
Jo-Anne Campbell,
Jarvis Bay
What a response … what a community!
Dear Editor:
What a tragedy and terrible loss has been suffered by the victims of last week’s house inferno. I can’t even begin to imagine what each of these families and individuals are going through and in some way I’m certain we all feel their loss.
Like many others, my mind raced to thoughts of, “What can I do to help?” regardless of not even knowing these people personally. The response that has followed from dozens of area residents, service organizations and local businesses has been nothing short of amazing!
Since the fire, our office and phone lines at Sylvan Community Partners has encountered a steady stream of generous citizens. From young children bringing in their $5 donations and prized toys to the thousands of dollars in gift cards and donations, it has been absolutely incredible! It’s in times like these that we can truly see the generosity of the human heart being demonstrated.
I would like to applaud Jennifer at Victim Services for her tireless work in this difficult situation. My hat is also off to all the firefighters who put themselves at risk in order to contain this inferno and prevent the tragedy from being much, much worse.
For the victims, I know I can express on behalf of the hundreds of people who have called and given, we are saddened by your losses and will do whatever possible to help restore life back to normal as quickly as possible.
Community Partners will continue to be a conduit for donations and use every resource we have to help. Donations can also be dropped off at Servus Credit Union in Sylvan Lake.
It makes me very proud to be a part of this community when we see this level of concern for our fellow citizens.
Dale Plante, chairman,
Sylvan Lake & Area
Community Partners
