To send a letter to the editor click here
Dear Editor:
It never ceases to amaze me how people with no money in commercial property or any intention of putting money into it can spend or stymie the people that do.
I have watched council and MPC (Municipal Planning Commission) design a vision for Sylvan downtown and 50th Street over the last five years. The more their vision grows the more empty lots I see. They do not see this vision as unaffordable and ill thought out (ie. underground parking in low land).
Ah ha, they say, your vision is short-sighted. They say ours and our non-resident hired planning architect is a 30 year vision. Even the Chinese would plan only five years ahead with their Great Leap Forwards (look how that turned out). Perhaps they are planning a parade of the bylaw officers on May Day to show solidarity and hand our planner his award from his peers. I really don’t understand the award as his vision and planning haven’t changed a thing downtown nor brought one business. It must be an award for penmanship and presentation (the teachers on council would understand this) or it could be like President Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize given on the prayers of us hoping he gets it right.
Should not the vision come from property owners and stakeholders (key words) of the downtown, then presented to council to implement. After all, it’s our money and risk that’s going to do it. As a matter of fact, without our mayor we don’t have one risk taker businessman on council. Yet they tell us what will work. Well, ladies and gentlemen of planning, here’s your chance to step up to the plate, open your wallets, not the taxpayers’, and show the rest of us uneducated shopkeepers how it is done. Donald Trump could not make money downtown with this plan. The only people who can afford the condos you want downtown are retirees. Why would older people want to be in that gong show in the summer.
The reason for this letter is at a recent MPC meeting we watched a project insulted by the chairman. This was done by sticking her fingers in her ears and going nah, nah, nah. Then to compound the insult, at the next meeting he was told their input was not needed in the process and if he spoke again he would be ejected. Curiously this was not reported in the local paper that was in attendance.
I was shocked! This is an elected councillor, in public, representing us and our area. I realize she is elected, but democracy never promised the best would be elected, only that someone would be. This is embarrassing to the town and citizens. I can only hope that the next election does not conform to the Low Hanging Fruit, Peter Principle again.
I actually, after the meeting, went and apologized to the developer for this childish behaviour. I would not blame the owner of these rather large prominent lots if now he rented or sold them to individual biker gangs or a chapter of the Al Quaida cheerleaders. These would be within the zoning and would put feet on the ground downtown (buzz phrase of planning).
Remember, this is the same group that is allowing the Wal-Mart of toilets to be built in front of the businesses on the beach. I thank my lucky stars I don’t own the lots whose views have changed from lake to commode.
Well enough of my rant. I hope this will get people out to vote. I will leave on this note. Development happens in spite of council and development departments, not because of them. Development money flows to the path of least resistance. Your vision has made the downtown cost of development three times what the Highway 20 area costs. Where do you think the money is going to go?
Rod English,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor:
The cultural significance of a hockey game has drastically changed since 1972 and even since 1987. Some would argue, and rightfully so, that the significance has even decreased since those years but the game and the “golden goal” on Sunday was the most significant hockey and sporting moment any of us in Canada will see in our entire life time going forward.
In fact aside from personal milestones and national and global tragedy that moment may go down as the biggest moment any of us will ever witness. It is the definition of the answer to “Where were you when?” It will be at least 20 to 30 years before the Olympics come back to Canada so it is virtually impossible for anything to surpass it. Winning an Olympic gold medal game in men’s hockey, in overtime, at home, against an arch rival who beat us earlier in the tournament with the entire world watching and for the most part cheering for us, cannot be topped.
It’s crazy but we all witnessed without a shadow of a doubt Sidney Crosby’s career defining moment. It seems weird to actually know that given he’s only 22, but it’s true. Just as nothing will ever surpass that game nothing he can do will ever surpass that goal.
Paul Henderson’s goal in 1972 was huge for obvious reasons but the stage wasn’t as big in terms of being global. At least I don’t think so. I wasn’t born yet so my opinions on that are based off growing up in Canada never being able to escape it. “Henderson has scored for Canada!” No kidding. He seems to score that goal everyday.
The Canada Cup in 1987 was also huge for a new generation looking for their own Summit Series moment and they (we) got it when Gretzky passed the puck to Lemieux allowing Super Mario to score with just over a minute left to clinch the series. The “mystery” of the Russians was still somewhat there, if only just a little, but that was just a hockey tournament. The world wasn’t watching. At least not as intently and it surely didn’t attract non hockey fans outside of Canada and the Soviet Union. I remember the 1987 Canada Cup like it was yesterday and I can say with full confidence that what happened on Sunday was bigger.
The gold medal game at the 2010 Winter Olympics will no doubt have the lasting impression that the ‘72 Summit Series and ‘87 Canada Cup have had. Three, almost four, new generations of Canadian hockey fans … actually Canadians period, will ensure that. The legend of Sidney Crosby ensures it. We will see that goal in every single Crosby montage for the rest of his career. On or off the ice. It will be in every Canadian tribute about what it means to be Canadian. And we will no doubt even see it in beer commercials eventually. Even if we wanted to forget it (why would we?) we won’t be able to. We won’t be allowed to forget the way we were allowed to unintentionally forget our first Olympic gold medal victory in 50 years at Salt Lake City winter games in 2002.
Despite my opening sentence, Sunday was one of those historical and cultural defining moments that when it happens you know it instantly. Canadian hockey triumphs (and tragedies) will come and go from here on out but not one of them will ever be like it was on Sunday, February 28th, 2010. To say it was extremely rare would be an understatement. To say I’m glad I witnessed it would also be an understatement.
Kevin Putnam,
Red Deer (Sylvan Lake)
Dear Editor:
Lest our legislators are misled by the lobbying efforts of the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries, they should be aware of a study by the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) entitled “Health at a Glance”.
The study reveals that in 2007, life expectancy in the United States was 78.0 years and infant mortality was 6.4 per thousand births. The figures for Canada were 80.3 and 4.6 respectively.
Statistics provided by the OECD report indicate that the U.S., with its private health care system, spent 16 per cent of its gross domestic product on health, while Canada, with a publicly funded system, spent only 10.1 per cent. Despite this disparity in spending, Canadians lived longer and more of our infants survived.
In a private health care system a sizable proportion of health care funding is directed toward providing profits for corporate shareholders.
These international corporations spare no effort in lobbying for the privatization of health care in Canada. I’ve no doubt they view Canada as a nice fat cash cow, ready to be milked.
William Dascavich,
Edmonton
February 26, 2010
Dear Editor:
One of the valued roles newspapers have is to foster dialogue in their communities. In today’s rapidly evolving world of technology and communication, it is interesting to see how these changes affect society.
In an effort to encourage youth to contribute their thoughts concerning various aspects of the role of newspapers, the Alberta Press Council; offers an annual $2,000 scholarship for a graduating high school student going on to post-secondary studies.
This year’s topic involves something today’s young adults are passionate about – Facebook! We want to know their thoughts on:
“Facing up to Facebook: How Does the Traditional Newspaper Survive?”
All Grade 12 students have to do is write an essay of 1,000–1,100 words — that’s $2 a word — and submit their entry postmarked no later then Feb. 28th. If it is judged to be the most insightful, creative and coherent, the winning writer will receive a great award to help offset costs at their college, university or other institution in whatever field they choose to study.
In addition to the $2,000 award, the winning essay may be published in daily and weekly newspapers throughout Alberta as well as on our website and in our annual report. What a great way for a young person to be recognized at the beginning of their post-secondary journey!
I encourage parents and teachers to alert students to this valuable scholarship opportunity, and to direct them to www.albertapresscouncil.ca for details.
David Forbes, Chairman,
Scholarship Committee,
Alberta Press Council
Dear Editor,
Re: Differences of philosophy defeated Rexall Drugs proposal
I believe that the Municipal Planning Commission’s decisions were correct, both when restricting its parameters to the existing land use district requirements and also in its interpretation of the definition of ‘convenience store’.
Also, with some regret, I agree with the new plan’s concept of a three storey building on all corners of the 50th St. redevelopment area so as to increase the downtown population and hence, its vitality.
What really concerns me would be the application of that new plan policy to the Rexall Drugs proposal on 50th St. and 47 Ave., which has become one of the four busiest intersections in the community. Even under the old rules, I can’t see how westbound and southbound traffic can enter the proposed store’s parking lot without crossing over a lane for traffic going in the opposite direction.
Surely, adding the vehicles of the residents living on the upper floors of any new building proposed under the 50th Street Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP), for that corner, would only exacerbate that problem.
I suppose one should just assume that this issue will be addressed in advance of construction, but since that didn’t happen at the intersection of 47th Ave. and Highway 20, I believe the matter merits mentioning.
Donna Stinson,
Sylvan Lake
February 19, 2010
Dear Editor:
Recently, the Grade 5 students from École Steffie Woima Elementary School had the opportunity to learn to curl at our local curling rink. The classes had a wonderful time at the rink as they learned curling techniques and ended their time by playing a game.
Many wonderful volunteers, including a large number from the seniors’ league, came out to assist the students in learning the skills. We were also able to celebrate our classes’ Christmas party by having a mini-bonspiel day at the rink.
The Grade 5 teachers would like to take a moment to thank Joel at the curling rink as well as Shelley and Sandra for their hard work with the scheduling. We also want to thank all those who came out to volunteer and made this a memorable experience for the students. We look forward to participating in curling again next year!
Leah Rawlings, Marilyn Mann, Jackie Hann
Dear Editor:
I refer to an amazing Sylvan Lake Ice Marathon held on Family Day 2010.
I felt that I must write and say what a great day Foothills Speed Skating Association (FSSA) committee and the Town of Sylvan Lake pulled together in such a short period of time — well done all of you.
It was such a pleasure to be on the lake to see so many people enjoying themselves, and what a crowd there was. There were no losers, only winners, especially those who put on their skates and either raced or entered the tour. Yes you had the blueprint, of the established event that the FSSA organized between 2003 and 2007, to work from. However, that had been put to sleep and you have now awakened a new event by giving the old one the kiss of new life. I wish you all the luck in the world with promoting this event in the future. I hear that you are already talking about next year.
I would like to single out Gary and Dave from Public Works for the highest acclaim. Gary carved the track with his grader and Dave prepared the ice with his water tanker. Dave was also down on the ice at 7 a.m. on Monday sweeping snow. Well done both of you, without you and the support from Public Works, Recreation and Parks, Protective Services, Town Council, the Provincial Park and all the volunteers, this event would never have happened.
Lastly, I would like to thank Mayor Susan Samson for kicking butt to keep this dream alive during 2008 and 2009. She never gave up, even when many of us faltered. Thanks to you all, I believe the Town of Sylvan Lake has moved into a new era of collaboration and communication, and long may it continue,
it’s far better that way.
John Walsh,
Sylvan Lake
February 12, 2010
Dear Editor:
It’s been two years I’ve lived here and have found that I “missed” the newsletter that explains the do’s and don’ts of dropping your children off at C. P. Blakely School!
I did receive the one from the school stating how they wanted it done for safety reasons for the children but apparently missed the “mothers” one!
I’m not sure how those few mothers out there can just STOP, in the middle of a busy street, get out, open all doors, kiss kids and wave while four or five cars wait for them! Or the ones who let them weave in and out of these cars to cross the street!
I’m hoping that their children are smarter than the parents!
Cindy Dyrland,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor:
The so called crisis in health care has nothing to do with over expenditure. It has everything to do with lack of revenue. The Alberta government made a series of fiscally irresponsible decisions over the past decade, all of which had a negative impact on the revenue side of the budget equation.
A. It introduced a flat provincial income tax rate of 10% in 2001, the only beneficiaries of which are Albertans in the very highest income tax bracket. Albertans in the middle and lowest tax brackets actually pay a higher tax rate than many other Canadians. This flat tax conservatively reduced Alberta tax revenue by over $5.5 billion dollars in 2006 alone.
B. It eliminated Alberta Health Care premiums on January 1, 2009 which resulted in a $1.1 billion per year reduction in revenue.
C. It introduced royalty schemes which have resulted in the revenue stream to the province declining significantly.
D. It introduced and then eliminated a tax increase on alcohol and tobacco in 2009. This decreased potential revenue by approximately $180 million per year.
The net result of these four fiscally irresponsible decisions has been a reduction in revenue of a minimum of $7 billion each and every year.
These decisions were made because of conservative ideology rather than being based on solid fiscal principles. The Alberta government actually boasts, on its own website, about the fact that it gives up approximately $10 to $18 billion in steady revenue every year. This includes both foregone tax revenue and royalties.
If the government had not made these fiscally irresponsible decisions, it would now be in a huge surplus position, in the midst of a world wide recession, and there would be no need for the drastic cuts to health care being proposed by the very government which brought about the revenue crisis in the first place.
Michael O’Hanlon,
Red Deer
February 5, 2010
Dear Editor,
I seek your help. Hopefully, through the pages of your fine newspaper, my problem can be brought to the attention of your readers. Perhaps then the holder of the office of Minister of Transportation, Luke Ouellette, will be moved to “get out of the ditch”.
We all know the consequences of mixing drinking and driving. Equally deadly, but much more insidious, is the practise of mixing driving and bureaucratic foolishness. Let me offer an example.
Highway 20 and Highway 12 intersect, dangerously, in a river valley near the town of Bentley. Visibility is frequently compromised. Although the Ministry of Pavement and Silly Road Construction has rebuilt this particular intersection at least three times in the past generation, it is still a dangerous, life-threatening intersection. Lives have been lost, people have been hurt, and families have been ripped apart.
After the latest intersection reconfiguration, the Department of Signs and Paint posted new signs that reduced the speed limit to 80 kmh through the intersection. There were sounds of rejoicing in Bentley-land. Finally, a safety initiative had actually been initiated; there was even talk of flashing red lights on Highway 12 and flashing yellow lights on Highway 20. Would wonders never cease? Now all that was needed was a sheriff to regularly and predictably enforce the new, slower speed limit and the status quo would have been vanquished. A few speeding tickets and a new reality (safety before speed) would allow locals and tourists alike to navigate this dangerous highway intersection more safely than ever before.
Are you sitting down? If not, please do. Even those of us inured to bureaucratic idiocy will find it hard to believe what the Department of Big Trucks and Little Cars did next. They sent a Safety Engineer to evaluate the intersection. This person noted that a large number of vehicles did not observe the newly posted 80 kmh speed limit. So, this “safety specialist” apparently went back to Edmonton and advised his boss that, “we might as well go back to the old 100 kmh speed limit”. And they did. Unbelievable. Irresponsible, incompetent, or both?
From then until now, there have been official complaints about this wicked perversion of a decision. Wolf Creek School Board has complained. The Town of Bentley has complained. Ty Lund, MLA for the Bentley area, and a former Minister of Transportation, has strenuously objected. No matter who, no matter why, the results of legitimate, considered complaints continue to be arrogantly and dangerously ignored. The present speed limit remains at 100 kmh, which is too high. We all know that speed kills. This is especially true in areas of poor visibility.
On this issue, the magnificent Minister of Roads, Signs and Culverts is driving blind and he is speeding. He, like that intersection, is an accident waiting to happen. Help me write him a ticket. Thank you for your attention.
Rick Cookson-Hills,
Bentley
January 29, 2010
Dear Editor,
We are really so lucky to live in Canada, and this community in particular.
We have so many blessings. Would we want to be in Haiti right now? Quite a number of people here would go to help if they could. However, many are seriously committed to serving people right here, where we live. Trying to make things better.
I refer to those with high ideals of service who travel far and wide in the area to reach people who need help. Homecare staff and caregivers in many
areas. Ambulance staff, firefighters, police, town management, town maintenance staff, local church members from all denominations, service clubs of all kinds.
Then the blessed volunteers within this place. Snow Angels, drivers, organizers, and on it goes.
Dedicated and committed young people as well as seniors, and working people.
The taxi drivers in town are also to be commended for the wonderful care and service they provide. Also Canada Post, and so many businesses. And of course the News staff, for attempting to keep those of us who can read informed.
I hope that covers everyone.
Everybody can find my phone number in the book if they feel left out. Or disagree. So that’s it for this time.
Thanks for listening.
Helen McLean,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor:
I want to take a moment to thank everyone involved in making the recent Olympic Torch Relay through our Chinook’s Edge communities such a memorable and rewarding event for our students. When the torch arrived to our communities, local businesses held special promotional activities, the mayor and other dignitaries visited classrooms to see the hard work students and staff put into Olympic decorations, and community groups worked to create a true celebration of national pride.
Once the torch relay was complete, many of the runners who had taken part made arrangements to visit our schools. They talked to students about their exciting experience, participated in small versions of a torch relay around the school grounds and let students experience holding the torch. Since the relay, literally hundreds of Chinook’s Edge students have carried the torch and they have each been touched by the Olympic spirit.
All of this has happened because of the enthusiasm of our great neighbours and friends, and I wanted to thank you. Our strong communities are ensuring all our students feel part of this exciting time. Enjoy the Olympic Games!
Jim Gibbons
Superintendent of Schools
Chinook’s Edge School Division No. 73
Dear Editor,
Re: Councillor wants county’s autonomy on development decisions clearly stated, SLN, Jan. 22
In the recent SLN article on a Lacombe County debate of its plan to develop its land within the Sylvan Lake watershed councillor Rod McDermand was quoted as saying “The message we have to take is we don’t want people to interfere in our development plans, full stop.”
Too bad the game is not played that way. The Flames and Oilers don’t want opponents to score on them either. But they do.
McDermand is right to call for a clear restatement of the county’s development authority. He should also be aware that federal and provincial laws exist to protect highly sensitive water resources like Sylvan Lake and that they can trump county bylaws and regulations. His view, that public concern about the consequence of adding up to 20,000 more people to Lacombe County’s 62 per cent of the land within the watershed is obstructionist, is right too. That obstruction is to protect a precious resource from destruction.
Lacombe County has written the book on obstructionism. During the last decade its representatives have confounded the Sylvan Lake Management Plan Committee and blocked action that would have protected the natural environment of the watershed.
Judy Payne of Sylvan Lake, the new chair of that committee, has started a fresh initiative to achieve the goals originally adopted by members in 2000 (including Lacombe County) by building on ten years of study and analysis of our watershed. All those reports are readily available to Lacombe councillors and the public on Lacombe County’s official website.
The brand new Alberta Land Stewardship Act makes provision for locally designed sub-watershed plans precisely of the sort that annoys Lacombe’s councillors.
Sylvan Lake Watershed Stewardship Society (SLWSS) advocates action under the terms of that law precisely for the reasons that have caused Lacombe County to flex its council’s dictatorial muscles. SLWSS believes the watershed is at increased risk because of Lacombe County’s land development action.
Nevertheless, we do applaud Lacombe County’s recognition that Sylvan Lake’s current water quality must be maintained. Keeping it that way will require stewardship and co-operation by the team of governments, land owners and residents who are committed to preserving the watershed and lake as a unique Central Alberta asset.
Concerned citizens can find out more at our SLWSS website (http://slwss.org) and become a watershed protector by joining the society.
Make Lacombe’s councillors play the land development game by the rules.
Graeme Strathdee
V.P., Sylvan Lake Watershed Stewardship Society
January 22, 2010
Dear Editor,
For the past few months Albertans, and rural landowners in particular, have been bombarded with the message that we need new electrical lines, and sacrifices must be made. But not all the sacrifices will be equal.
For the past 40 years a small group of landowners has put up with two of AltaLink’s ugly and intrusive steel tower lines. Now this small group is being asked to sacrifice again, and host additional power through their lands. This is neither fair, nor particularly intelligent planning.
Putting over 80 per cent of Alberta’s electricity down a single narrow route is an invitation to accident, failure or worse. You really haven’t lived until you have attempted to steer huge farm equipment, weighing more than the combined weight of three towers, around these obstacles. Ice storms, wild summer weather and tornadoes all pose a large risk for these lines. Why would our government want to put so many eggs in one basket?
AltaLink, the company which stands to profit from constructing these lines, is now travelling the country and advertising that it wants to listen to landowners. Evidently their short memory does not include the fact that no public hearing has been held to determine if new electrical lines are actually needed at all. Enmax, the utility that is responsible for providing electricity to the 40 per cent of Alberta’s population that lives south of Red Deer is adamant that the new lines are not needed.
So is AltaLink’s “businessman’s puffery” a sufficient reason to saddle every Albertan with an electrical meter with hundreds of dollars of extra costs? Do AltaLink’s guaranteed profits mean landowners should give up their land and tolerate a further imposition on their homes and livelihoods?
As two of the landowners who are being asked to accept an additional burden for “the great good of Alberta” we would like to see some real evidence, tested in an impartial hearing process, to discover if a new power line is needed and if so, where the most sensible location for one might be. We rather doubt there is a case to be made for placing an unfair, undue burden on the hundreds of landowners who have already done their part to serve “Albertans’ greater public interest”.
Ken Larsen, Benalto
A. Heinrich, Alsike
Dear Editor,
In response to Mr. Marks’ letter “Canadians losing freedoms, rights by stealth”:
With all respect, Mr. Marks, do you recall when Liberal leader Stephane Dion said he wouldn’t form a coalition with the NDP because they had “bad economics” that weren’t in the best interest of our country? A few weeks later the Liberals did not only that, but also hopped into bed with the separatist Bloc Quebecois — a party who’s clearly stated aim is to dismantle Canada. Believe me, I understand your frustration with our prime minister, and fully support your right to criticize him, but personally I don’t see a superior federal alternative at this time.
As for what the papers in Europe say, no, I don’t care. The fact is that most of the European press is fiercely leftist, and that the prime minister is a conservative is reason enough for them to attack him. Again, I’m not saying your arguments are without merit, but I’m pretty sure the right wing Europeans think we’re the bees knees — and they’re the ones who we do business with.
In my opinion, Mr. Marks, we Canadians should think for ourselves. Come election time (and heaven knows we’ve had enough elections lately) we should vote for whomever we feel is the best candidate. If anyone else wants a say in who leads us they can immigrate to Canada and apply for citizenship. !
Serge Stelmack,
Sylvan Lake
January 15, 2010
Dear Editor,
I am writing this in response to the concerned citizen and his judgmental letter toward the town workers.
I personally know some of the town workers, their work ethic, and how hard they do work at their job. I don't remember ever seeing any thanks or recognition for the work they do on a regular basis.
Instead of writing the editor, maybe one should phone the town office and report this to them. Are we absolutely sure this was a town truck? and town worker?
I think we need to start the year off on a positive note and appreciate the efforts of our town and it's workers. Often, like many jobs, it is thankless! So I will begin by saying a BIG THANK YOU to our town workers for working so hard! Keep it up!
Jacqui Fletcher,
Sylvan Lake
The following letter was sent to Sylvan Lake News as a letter to the editor as well as to councillors during the current debate.
Mayor and council members,
I am an ATV user of the current bylaw that allows travel from home to the lake for winter activities. As a law abiding citizen, I do not want to see this privilege removed from me as an ATV user, or the other snowmobile users.
I use my ATV in the winter months as a work machine to plow snow. This includes sidewalks in my neighbourhood and some neighbours’ driveways. I also use my ATVs with my wife and three children to enjoy a nice winter day on the lake.
There are some misconceptions in this debate that I would like to clarify:
• ATV’s and snowmobiles cannot be identified. The fact is any off road machine must be licenced and insured to travel on crown land. The licence must be permanently mounted in a visible location. During the summer of 2009, provincial conservation officers have been enforcing this law in the back country. The people that are abiding by this law are the same ones wanting to enjoy the privilege of the Sylvan Lake bylaw.
• Excessive noise. A law abiding user of either an ATV or snowmobile is not creating any more noise (when travelling at 20 km/hr), than a motorcycle, lawnmower or nitrous powered remote control car. A general comment could also be made that most ATVs have lower decibel ratings than snowmobiles and Harley Davidson motorcycles.
• Ignorance of the bylaw and bylaw rules. Not everyone is aware of all the regulations pertaining to the bylaw. This includes the local RCMP, as I have personally had two different RCMP officers provide different and opposing interpretations of one of the regulations. These misconceptions by the public and RCMP may be due to the semantics of the bylaw.
• The old CP rail line. Originally the old CP railway right of way was not included in the town limits. Recently the town purchased this land and created a green space with it. But the issue of this ownership has lead to some misconceptions in the public about the applicable use of the bylaw on these lands. Now that Sylvan owns this land and it’s a green space, ATVs and snowmobiles cannot travel on it.
There was a published comment that caught my attention, “It’s easy to exclude ATVs because they’re a bad group for the most part”. This is a very gross generalization! There are a lot of people who are following the bylaw regulations who should not be penalized because of wrong doing by others. What is the real root cause issue with ATV users? There are a few root causes that have led to this current debate. Let’s address these issues and change the bylaw to rectify them rather than remove the privilege for all or some users.
I have some possible recommendations without repeating the ones already mentioned by other citizens. These recommendations are based on continuing to allow family access to the lake using the bylaw.
1. Limit the age of drivers of ATVs and snowmobiles to 18 years unless accompanied by a legal guardian.
2. Limit the use of all ATVs and snowmobiles to weekends only.
3. Change the hours of use from 7 a.m.-11 p.m. to 9 a.m.-9 p.m.
In my opinion, education is the biggest factor to this issue. There is room for improvement to educate the users of the ATV and snowmobile bylaw by the town, and by the public users themselves.
Councillor Joan Barnes said it best, “Let’s just give people freedom. We sit here and bylaw everything, we just bylaw people to death. Keep it so we can still have fun.”
Chad Alexander,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
The new terms being generated in international medias, about Canadians in this new world are “INDIFFERENCE” and “IGNORANCE”. I think it is our indifference that only makes us appear ignorant.
Government members and intellects are astonished that we appear indifferent to the assault on democracy in our own back yard, thus the question of our intellect.
A British publication writes that the prime minister’s proroguing of parliament was clearly in the prime minister’s own “naked self interest” and would not be tolerated in other democracies. Add in the aggressive actions against almost every watchdog and committee established to protect Canadians against corruption. Firing, decommissioning, budget cuts, dismantling, and character assassinations to name but a few then add in denials, obstructions, evasions and attack ads and we have the makings of an autocratic government.
This so called law and order government has done everything it can to manipulate the rules, taken to courts those who resist or fight back, fired those who refuse to compromise safety, cut funding to watchdogs who present a different picture that the one the government is trying to paint, obstructed and refused to co-operate with commissions that were set up to ensure compliance and investigate the possibilities of wrong doings.
In the 21st century Canada will not be taken over by generals turning the military against us, Canada will lose its freedoms and rights by stealth. Rules and restrictions will be installed under the guise of an emergency. We will lose a part of our identity and dignity a little bit at a time.
Democracy will die a “Death from a Thousand Cuts”. Laws will be implemented that are politically motivated but will be in reality ineffectual. Watchdogs will languish under heavy burdens and budget cuts. Commissions will die through attrition. Boards will not meet and issues will go unresolved. Opposing views will be silenced by threats, and huge political machines with huge negative advertising budgets.
Canadians are apparently unconcerned but as the saying goes, “You don’t know what you have until it is gone.” Other countries that have histories much longer than ours can see what is happening and they can talk about similar instances in their history but Canada being a young country needs to relive history, re-invent the wheel.
The prime minister is supposed to lead by example and show that laws affect everyone equally. This prime minister not only does not respect the laws but has made an international name for his skills in finding manoeuvres and loopholes to avoid complying with the laws.
He breaks traditions at his whim, manipulates the rules to his benefit and takes to court anyone who calls him on his actions.
Canadians are worried about their jobs and are perhaps more inclined to be reactive than proactive. Everyone else can see that indifference and ignorance cannot win the battle against well financed power and greed and our prime minister is counting on it. We were once called “cool”, now we are just “Indifferent” and “ignorant”.
I wonder what we will be called next. Do we care?
Garfield Marks,
Red Deer
Dear Editor,
Did you know that 40 per cent of the flavoured tobacco sold in Canada is bought in Alberta?
Perhaps even more shocking is the fact that one quarter of all tobacco “spit” or “chew” users are between the ages of 15 and 19 years old. And that’s exactly how the tobacco industry intends it. As it loses its older smokers, the industry is reeling in younger users with fruit- and candy-flavoured tobacco products. Such flavours mask the unpleasant taste of tobacco and make it easier for kids to use, allowing them to become addicted.
But there isn’t a flavour in the world that can mask the deadly consequences of chewing tobacco. The same cancer-causing substances in cigarettes are also in chewing tobacco, regardless of flavourings added.
We dare you to find a high school locker room or an arena where a significant number of the young players aren’t chewing tobacco. And it’s so much easier to get away with than smoking. It’s easier to conceal and, as many users will argue, it’s not bothering anyone else.
But this form of tobacco is just as habit forming and lethal, and it’s unconscionable that the tobacco industry is targeting kids and teenagers with it.
So the Canadian Cancer Society urges you to check on your kids — what are they chewing? Sure, it could be gum. Or, it could be a lethal, addictive tobacco product that might plague them for the rest of their lives.
For more information, go to cancer.ca where you can find out more about the deceptive marketing practices of the tobacco industry and how they’re trying to lure kids into becoming users.
Jenna Millar,
Community Services Coordinator,
Canadian Cancer Society – Red Deer
Dear Editor,
Judging by the uproar over Prime Minister Stephan Harper proroguing parliament, it is apparent that a great many Canadians are still deluded into believing that the majority of MPs they elect serve any other purpose than to create the illusion that power lies with the common people.
The reality is that if MPs controlled Parliament, Canada’s wealthy corporate elite would not be able to use tax havens and loopholes to get away without paying their fair share of taxes, foreign takeover of Canadian enterprises would be banned, international petroleum corporations would not be getting away with scandalously low oil and gas royalties, the export of military hardware would not be a major industry in Canada, Canadian troops would not be playing a combat role in a futile war, social programs and infrastructure replacement would be adequately funded, and the list goes on and on.
The real power in Ottawa lies with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE), a non-partisan organization made up of about 150 chief executive officers of leading Canadian enterprises. They maintain a force of several thousand lobbyists in Ottawa who like to call themselves “government affairs consultants”. Their function is to influence government policy in favour of their clients and to maintain a constant vigil to ensure that the power and interests of the corporate elite are not infringed. They accomplish this by arranging “information” meetings with government representatives, their aids, senior civil servants, and their advisors. They may also “entertain” their targets in various ways with a view to achieving their co-operation.
It is my conviction that the major decisions in Ottawa originate in private corporate boardrooms. Parliament serves merely to rubber stamp them.
William Dascavich,
Edmonton
January 8, 2010
Dear Editor,
I refer to the letters submitted by Karen Dorval and Steve Flood on the use of off road vehicles (ORV) in Sylvan Lake.
Congratulations on Steve’s letter making some very positive comments aimed at overcoming the problems that are occurring in this town.
As for Karen Dorval’s letter, I do believe that council has worked very hard over the past few years to promote ‘lawful use’ of OHVs (off highway vehicles), that would enable the continuance of the current bylaw.
In the 1980s a bylaw was passed to enable residents of Sylvan Lake to drive snowmobiles from their homes to the lake and back again by the shortest route. It was amended in 2004 to include quads. Providing the riders comply with legal documentation, licencing and maintenance they are allowed to drive at a maximum speed of 20kph along the roads, no more.
Since 1980 snowmobiles and quads have become far more powerful and because of the way some are driven they are indeed noisy and antisocial. The same comment that said there were only 10 per cent of owners not complying with the current bylaw also stated that there were 1,000 ORVs in Sylvan Lake; so therefore, there are 100 lawbreakers. Are you condoning this and saying that is acceptable?
This is a recreational activity, some users have abused the bylaw and unless those users exercise control and abide by the bylaw I hope that it will be repealed. However, if OHVs are driven in accordance with the bylaw then I hope the bylaw will remain.
One of the main problems is identifying the violators; would it be possible to introduce users wearing a vest with the permit number clearly shown. As for policing troubled areas take a look at the recreation area at the junction of 48th Avenue and 60th Street, I suggest that with a little effort the bylaw officers could follow on foot to where the snowmobile comes from.
Two wrongs do not make a right and I agree with the comment regarding the removal of snow from the sidewalks. I also note that action will only be taken as the result of a complaint. Is it necessary to be specific where sidewalks are not cleared or can Karen’s and my comments qualify as a general complaint and the bylaw officer in his travels be a little proactive rather than reactive to this problem?
The message here is, if the bylaw was not violated there would be no need for these letters and council would not be concerned.
John Walsh,
Sylvan Lake
December 31, 2009
Dear Editor,
I am writing in response to our town council passing second reading on changing the bylaw in Sylvan Lake so that residents can no longer drive their snowmobiles and quads down to the lake.
It is my understanding that council stated 10 per cent of snowmobilers were not complying with the current bylaw. There are other bylaws that residents don’t comply with, such as shoveling the snow on the sidewalks in front of their homes. I drove through Fox Run and Lakeway Landing and on average for every 10 homes, 3 had not shoveled the sidewalk. That’s more than 10 per cent, should we change the bylaw?
As a licensed realtor in Sylvan Lake, it is my professional opinion that changing this bylaw also affects real estate in our town. We promote ourselves saying we are a “Four Season Town”. Now it is a “Three Season Town”? People want to live here for many reasons, but one of them is the freedom to enjoy the beach in the summer, and the ice in the winter. Being able to walk to the beach in the summer, and drive to the lake on your snowmobile in the winter is a big draw to living here.
Sylvan Lake has always had the reputation of a great recreation place to live or visit. It’s unique in that we DO allow snowmobiles and quads to drive on the roads down to the lake in the winter. Why is council trying to change that? Real estate prices have dropped enough; let’s not do something to cause them to drop even more!
We all agree that there is not enough quality family time in our busy lives. We should be doing everything we can to encourage families to be active and enjoy our surroundings.
I’ve lived in Fox Run, Lakeway Landing, and now in the Cottage area. I brag that there are two months of chaos and entertainment, and 10 months of peace and quiet. I walk my dogs down the middle of the road; there is no traffic and I have never been bothered by a snowmobile, ever, in any location I have lived. I don’t understand where the negative comments are coming from because after living here for 11 years, I have never been inconvenienced or bothered by a snowmobile.
Please allow the people and families to continue to enjoy living in Sylvan Lake in a good way.
Karen Dorval,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
I have lived in Sylvan Lake for 16 years, and it has been a great pleasure for me and my family to have the opportunity to use the lake recreation year round.
I must admit that I have not gotten involved in the issues over the year hoping that they would work themselves out but I did attend the council meeting on Dec. 14 with regards to the reading of the bylaw for snowmobiles and ATVs to drive directly to the lake using the roads in town.
I understand that this is the third year that issues were being addressed. As a local resident, I felt the need to attend, as I see this as a valid bylaw if respected by the community.
Again, being new to the process I thought we would be there to be heard, offer our opinions and ideas and come to a solution that would be amicable to all. I heard pros and cons both making sense, but what I saw from some of our council members was that our voices were falling on deaf ears. In the end I thank council for giving the community the chance to address the concerns, as they set a date for third reading in Jan. 2010.
It would have been good to hear statistics from the last three years as to tickets issued, warnings and also any calls made by locals complaining of abuse of ATVs or snowmobiles so we would know, as a group, if we are heading in the right direction.
At the meeting it appeared only six to eight people were opposed to the bylaw and 40-50 for the bylaw with some changes if required. Now we need to focus our attention on solutions.
I follow now with a few options and I’m sure people of the community can add to this list:
1. Permits yearly for ATVs and snowmobiles wanting the right to use the bylaw, this also funds the policing needs of bylaw.
2. Direct route going directly to the east and west access point to avoid the downtown core.
3. Use of gas stations at the east entrance as to not congest the downtown core.
4. Citizen involvement to report users outside the law. Sled and ATV riders as well as citizens that don’t ride.
5. Stiffer penalties for those violators that are caught, i.e. A fine and no access permit for one year, impound the sled for those caught on green ways.
6. Police the troubled areas more, as there are few green ways.
Steve Flood,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
I am a tax paying citizen of Sylvan Lake. Why is it then, that when I was driving to work one morning, (I work in Red Deer) my truck got stuck in a big snow drift? Now why do we pay for equipment if we do not even use it properly. This is the part that really gets me, while I was stuck there were two snow plows half a block behind me. Instead of helping, these guys were sitting in their cabs, watching me, drinking coffee and smoking. They made absolutely no move to help me. Don’t get me wrong I like the idea of snowplows, but these guys were useless. This is where Sylvan Lake could really use some improving. I mean seriously, why do we hire people, pay them by the hour, at a fixed rate, if they won’t even do the job?
A concerned taxpayer,
A. Davies
Dear Editor,
Once again the “culture” portion of our community’s Recreation, Parks and Culture department is the poor country cousin with the dollars being skewed toward sports (additional ball diamonds, new curling club, replace the old arena). Sylvan Lake is a vibrant and diverse community but not all of us play sports. However, all of us do support sports through our tax dollars. I don’t begrudge that support and believe it to be money well-spent but when will we see support for the arts in this community?
The desire and need for some sort of performing arts facility has been established through community participation surveys and supported by previous Recreation, Parks & Open Spaces plans, which suggested that feasibility planning for a dedicated performing arts centre begin by 2006-2007. Unfortunately there is nothing in the short, medium or long range recommendations of the current plan that explicitly mentions such a facility.
The only alternative for a performing arts facility need not be a freestanding building. Comments made by members of Town Council and the Sylvan Lake Community Services Board seem to involve only this very costly option, which makes it too easy to entirely scrap the facility. Rather than skid the entire budget allocation for Performing Arts centre, begin the feasibility studies called for in the Town’s previous Recreation, Parks & Open Spaces plan.
While a freestanding facility is not a necessity, a functional one is. Councillor (Judy) Payne suggested that Sylvan Lake’s current arts centre, housed at H.J. Cody School, is a “great facility”. No disrespect to H.J. Cody School but the Stevenson Performing Arts Centre is far from great. It lacks storage space for props, it lacks dressing rooms for performers, it lacks a green room, it lacks easy access from outside, it lacks appropriate space to set up food and drink service, it lacks air conditioning (which makes it almost unbearable to use in the hot summer months), the seats need replacing, the stage floor needs repair, the exterior requires additional lighting for safety purposes. Allocate some of the recreation levy increase toward improvements of this facility.
At last year’s budget discussions councillor Payne put forward a plea to allocate funds to the Sylvan Lake Management Committee. She believed that it was vital the Town recognize the importance of the committee’s mandate by budgeting for it regardless of the fact that there was no committee, no projects and no plans for the group. I think that performing arts in Sylvan Lake could use some of that passion.
Kathy Bradshaw,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
I find the letter to “The Editor” submitted by Mr. Elliott and printed in the December 18, 2009 edition of The Sylvan Lake News, highly amusing, and at the same time, very disturbing. I have no problem with Mr. Elliott finding my temporary solution (roundabout) to reduce the number of accidents at the 11-781 intersection, “Fantastically Funny”. At least it proves he is making an attempt at contributing something to the community. It appears however, that in his elevated state of humor, Mr. Elliott failed to notice that the solution I proposed was temporary and would only be in place until the proposed changes for 781 and 20 have been completed. As Mr. Elliott is new to Sylvan Lake, I suppose we must excuse the fact that he is clearly unaware of, or possibly ignores the fact that the portion of highway 11 between the intersection of highway 20, to a considerable distance west of the intersection of highway 781 is posted at 80kph, as he is suggesting that people would be speeding toward the intersection at speeds in excess of 100kph. However, I guess this shouldn’t be surprising, as Mr. Elliott finds our local country citizens, “different”, because they don’t drive at least the posted speed limit when the road is, “High and Dry Basically…..”. I’m not quite sure what, “High and Dry Basically”……means? I have to wonder if Mr. Elliott is one of the “Morons” who loses the ability to use his or her brain when winter driving conditions arrive. In case I haven’t made myself clear, the “Morons”, are those among us, who insist on driving too fast for winter conditions. Therefore, I suppose it would be fair to assume that Mr. Elliott could be one of the “Idiots”, that would plow through the temporary roundabout, as I said would be the case in the article he found so “Fantastically Funny”!! I personally witnessed two roll-overs on highway 2 on Friday, December 11, 2009. The highway wasn’t particularly icy, but it was “slippery”. I doubt the roll-overs involved the “Country People”, as Mr. Elliott so eloquently stated………no, I suspect they were in the group of “Morons” who don’t understand why people have to drive soooo slow in winter driving conditions. What I find most disturbing about Mr. Elliott’s article is his reference to the “Country People”!! Most of who have likely lived most of their lives in this area, and have contributed much to the prosperity of Sylvan Lake and surrounding area. Other than your praise for the quality of reporting presented by The Sylvan Lake News, which I agree with, what have you contributed to the Town of Sylvan Lake and surrounding area Mr. Elliott??.............other than to insult the, “Country People, who in your opinion, must be Different”!!!
Gerald Ernst,
Sylvan Lake
December 18, 2009
Dear Editor,
I am a parent of a student that is involved in both drama and band. I could hardly believe my eyes when I read the account of Councillor Judy Payne’s support for the deletion of the budget item ($300,000) for the renovation of Stevenson Fine Arts Centre.
I must ask, what is an employee of the school that would directly benefit from such dollars, doing commenting on this budget item? This is a conflict of interest. Councillor Payne should have declared this and removed herself from the discussion.
I also ask myself, how can Councillor Payne speak on behalf of the fine arts centre without having sought input from those who are directly involved in its programming? Mrs. Payne is a chemistry teacher and usually has little to do with the fine arts activities. What credible understanding does she have of this topic? It appears Mrs. Payne has acted to undermine the work of her colleagues and the good of the many students involved in this programming. The general purpose of education is the full development of the potential of each individual. It seems that Mrs. Payne has difficulty in seeing the full development of a large number of students.
From discussions I have had around the high school, it appears that no one had been informed that the fine arts centre was being considered for funding. If they had been informed the list would have been long: new lights, storage areas, a piano, extra seating, enhanced ventilation, etc. Of course it is easy to cut potential funding when recipients have not been notified.
Councillor Payne you spilled the beans. It looks like council was again acting in anything but an open and transparent manner. However we are aware now of the potential upgrades that have been pulled out from under us. Thanks Mrs. Payne.
Over the past few years, hundreds of thousands of dollars have gone into maintaining the pool and making improvements on the multiplex. When was the last time dollars were committed to enhance the fine arts facility? The imbalance in funding is startling. Not all youth in our community play hockey or swim. However the way we allocate our money one would be led to believe that is the only ‘game in town’.
There are a number of youth whose talents and gifts are brought forth through the pursuit of the arts. How wonderful it is that we have such dedicated individuals like Ms. Swain and Mrs. Heisler who put endless hours into enhancing the lives of these youth and the community as a whole through excellent performances of drama, band and choir. Their efforts need to be applauded and financially supported!
“Alberta First” profiles the Town of Sylvan Lake by indicating “There is a reason why every year more and more families choose to call Sylvan Lake home. We invite you to come and see why!”
As a parent raising children here indeed I ask why? Our town tried to reduce our green space. It tried to take away Lions park from our children and families. It went after Kindercare which has served children in this community for years in order to have a toy-lending library in their space. And now it is acting to delete funding that would help to enhance the fine arts programming for youth in our community. We can raise our children in any town — but a good community is indeed hard to find!
Concerned parent,
Caroline Johanson,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
At 5:30 - 5:40 pm, Dec. 8th, as I was driving my daughter home from music lessons I had a very big truck tailgate me all the way up (Railway Ave.) 50th Ave.
I would really like to think that the person who was driving this vehicle would have been more considerate. When you have signs all over your vehicle it is not hard to know who you are. The big black 4x4 truck had red/green and black stripes.
I am still sure the speed limit in Sylvan Lake is 40 kms. I am sorry I was in your way (maybe you should get your speedometer checked?).
P Leptich,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
First I would like say I am new to Sylvan Lake and to tell you how much I enjoy reading your newspaper.
I was duly impressed with the Traffic on Highway 11A news report on page 5; Dec 11. Very well put together. You’ve obviously done a fair amount of research; there are items in the report not covered in the study.
The only problem I noticed was you mentioned a final proposed Highway 11A traffic speed of 100 kph, but the planning study recommends 110 kph; consistent with four laning. Who is correct?
I can see either speed being sensible; especially since I find it hard to find traffic going more than 70-80 kph on that highway lately - drives me up the wall; it’s pretty hard to pass in these winter conditions and the rolling terrain.
I don’t know why they want to go soooo slow; the road was high and dry basically … and then when they make a right hand turn they almost cross the center line before making the turn; instead of getting close to the right shoulder before turning … strange. Maybe country people are just different?
So that’s the rub in regards to proposed highway speed; how would those locals handle 110 kph?
I’m still enjoying your Dec. 11 newspaper; page 7 has three items of interest to me: Reflecting on the Past — a great read in hindsight.
Writer proposed roundabout for 11-781 intersection — fantastically funny, I loved Mr. Ernst’s thoughtfulness; of course the Alberta Transportation report has mentioned that Highway 781 will be realigned to match Highway 20 at the junction of Highway 11, which will be turned into a future interchange alleviating his concerns.
He’s definitely right about all the existing pavement available there. However, could you imagine vehicles going 100 kph or more on a major highway all of a sudden coming towards a roundabout? Especially at night? That’s hilarious! I know if it was me, I’d be changing my pants right afterwards …
Last but not least is the Happy with park creation article - is the park she’s referring to the old CP Railway alignment that just recently had a paved pathway constructed? The article wasn’t clear on that.
Keep up the great reporting.
Alan Elliott,
Sylvan Lake
Editor’s Note: The 100 kph figure is what the consultant said, although Mr. Elliott has since shown us that an initial information suggested 110 kph.
Consultant Robin Hutchinson clarified — using Alberta Transportation’s design standards the urban section will be posted at 100 kph but designed to 110 kph and the rural section will be posted at 110 kph and designed to 120 kph.
The off leash park is not on the former CP rail alignment. It’s between Westview Drive and 60th Street on 50th Avenue. The street between the railway and golf course is going to be closed to create the park.
Dear Editor,
I was at the town council meeting last night (Monday) and you, citizens of Sylvan Lake who have not been to one, you really should go. They happen on the second and fourth Monday of each month at 5:30 p.m. What an eye opener!
There were reported to be well over 120 people there, most of them for the purpose of listening to or speaking about the bylaw concerning snowmobiles and ATVs. It became obvious to me that on at least this issue, some of the councillors have absolutely no interest in hearing with an open mind, the wishes of the citizens that they represent and who were present.
Instead, I was extremely disappointed to hear them promote their own personal views, using generalities and half truths. Don’t these councillors know who they’re working for or how they got where they are? Listening with an open mind, is something we have an absolute right to expect from our town councillors.
Now, on the other hand, Mayor Samson either showed us all, first by listening, how a mayor should be acting, then by presenting a few possible compromises to both sides of the issue, one of which was reluctantly accepted by the majority of councillors, or, she demonstrated her ability as a consummate politician. Time will tell, but, I prefer to give her the benefit of the doubt for now.
Brian Mooney,
Sylvan Lake
December 11, 2009
Dear Editor,
I cannot tell you how happy I am to hear that we get a dog park!
I just wanted to say thank you so much to town council. I love my dogs and love that we now have somewhere we can go!
It’s so important to socialize dogs, so this is good in so many ways!
I think I speak for all dog owners when I say What an awesome decision and thanks again!
Amanda Merrier,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
I am aware, as some are, that Alberta Transportation has long term plans for the intersection of Highway 11 and Secondary Highway 781.
I am not certain, but it is my understanding that the planned changes are still a number of years from being completed. It is also my understanding that Alberta Transportation has no intention of spending the money to install lights at the intersection, because of the future plans. As a result of this position, accidents will occur and lives will be lost until something is done to improve safety.
The issue is critical now, and will continue to become more critical as time passes.
There is plenty of space at this intersection to paint a “Roundabout” on the surface of the existing pavement, install large portable concrete barriers to form the inner portion of the roundabout. Install a sign and a large flashing light from each direction as a warning to make motorists aware of the intersection.
Power is already at the location for street lights, so no huge cost would be incurred to supply power for the flashing lights. Four flashing lights, four signs, some paint or more durable striping and a few portable concrete barriers, as a temporary safety measure would be relatively inexpensive.
The real question is, what is the value of the life of a spouse, or your child, or someone you love. Yes, a few idiots will plow through the barriers, there is no doubt, but for the most part, the intersection would be much safer until such time as the proposed future changes are completed.
Gerald Ernst,
Sylvan Lake
December 4, 2009
Dear Editor,
I wholeheartedly agree with Trish Clark’s observations on the need for traffic lights at the Highway 781-Highway 11 intersection. It seems that Sylvan Lake’s population is fast outgrowing its road infrastructure, and with the Beacon Hill subdivision just getting started, things will only get worse.
I recently moved to Sylvan Lake and in the two months of using this intersection I have seen the remnants of at least four crashes. I, myself, have to cross this intersection at least twice a day, and each time hold my breath, wondering if someone is going to cross my path doing an illegal left or right turn.
Police presence at peak times may alleviate things short term, but perhaps those persons who decided to spend a fortune on the ridiculously expensive and arguably unnecessary traffic light system on Highway 20-47th Ave. might like to park up on 781 at 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. then go make some sensible decisions on where best to spend their money.
In the mean time, come on people of Sylvan, why not get a petition going about this? Maybe a project that could be backed by the Sylvan News?
Clare Bainbridge,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
This letter is in response to the letter regarding long wait times in the doctors’ office found in the Sylvan News on Nov. 27.
First, I am not a doctor. In fact, the last first aid course I had was in 1990. My medical experience is limited to what I read in Readers Digest. So I have no professional interest in the article.
At first it may seem nice if the doctors were always on time. Having said that, I think we should look at this a little closer.
For this to work the doctor would need to ensure the patient was out of the office on time every time. So at the end of the ten or fifteen minutes the bell goes off and “Next patient, please”. Does anyone really want that kind of care? These places do exist. Now what happens when the doctor needs to comfort a patient who has just been diagnosed with a terminal illness? Visits are not always routine. Other serious situations often come up requiring more time for these patents. We are not all in there because we have a sprained ankle.
As far as the complimentary coffee is concerned: Yes it would be nice if they supplied coffee and those nice soft chewy chocolate chip cookies, but I wonder how practical this would be. Go to Tim Hortons if you want a coffee.
In the end what does it matter if we have to wait a few minutes for something? Has time become that precious that we must have everything handed to us on time? Isn’t compassion and quality of care more important?
Gerald Welch,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
I think that we have forgotten what the holiday season is all about.
I heard some parents complaining the other day that they didn’t know what to buy their children for Christmas this year because they have everything that they could ever want and that they didn’t use any of the toys they already had.
I have a suggestion for any families that have the ability to do so … instead of buying things for your children that they don’t really need or won’t ever use why don’t you take them to the store and have them shop for a child that may not have any toys, that many clothes and may not eat three meals a day. Donate to the local food bank or the charity of your choice. This is what the season is supposed to be all about.
Jeannette Davis,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
I have just finished reading the “Improvement Levy” article in last week’s paper. In it Mr. Gassor is quoted as “deferring” the modernization of 45th and 47th streets for an unknown period, and instead suggesting an upgrade of 48th Avenue.
We bought a home on 45th Street several years ago, and at that time were told by the town that a program was in place and every year a street in the area was due to be upgraded. We have watched the past several years as our neighbours received their much needed street improvements, and hoped this might be the year for ours. For a street that is only two blocks long, it continues to amaze me at how busy it is. There is always a multitude of vehicles parked along the shoulders and in the winter months it can almost become an impassible one horse path. Come spring, or any major downpour, the water shed from 45th Avenue almost floods out many of the homes on the west side. 47th Street is just as narrow, but I cannot comment on any water flow issues. I know that it too has water shed from 45th Avenue.
Now it appears that our street maintenance has been “deferred”. It is not difficult to connect the dots and see that with the proposed multiplex in 2013, and presuming it will be located at or near their current sites, that sports has likely driven this decision. Granted, these are busy facilities, but judging by the number of vehicles typically around them, the patrons had no difficulty getting there.
The same cannot always be said for people trying to get to their homes along our streets, or staving off the water lapping at their doorstep.
Let us not forget that people live along these two streets … everyday, and have paid taxes towards the town for decades. Look after your citizens first. Friends and visitors have, and will, continue to find their way to the rinks and pool. Perhaps the new facilities mentioned should be constructed first and not risk damaging a new street with heavy equipment.
To our neighbours on 48th Avenue, I do not want to suggest that your street is not in need of improvements as well, but at least there is a fairly good parking apron along the north side.
The street reconstruction in this area is so close to completion. I am hoping that Mr. Gassor and council will reconsider the direction they appear to be heading, and finish the project that has been started.
David Spencer,
Sylvan Lake
Dear Editor,
Re: Wide ranging changes proposed, Nov. 20 Sylvan Lake News, page 3.
All parents and students who are involved in bands and choirs, drama performances, and real art, much check saveourfinearts.ca, organized out of Calgary.
Alberta Education is rapidly moving toward changing “Fine Arts” to “Art Education” and severely changing credits for students involved in Fine Arts. It will result in no bands, no choirs, because rather than the discipline involved in becoming proficient in Fine Arts from junior high to high school, Alberta Education would like ‘self discovery’ dabbling in whatever.
Go to www.education.alberta.ca/media/1115263/arts_ed_framework.pdf and read page 12 where Alberta Education desires students to have “flexible entry points”. Performance is not included.
Before Christmas, please write (not e-mail) a letter to Premier Stelmach, #224 Legislature Bldg., 10800 97 Avenue, Edmonton, T5K 2B6; MLA Luke Ouellette, Eastgate Mall, #18, 4804 42 Avenue, Innisfail, T4G 1T4 and Minister of Education Dave Hancock, #224 Legislature Bldg., 10800 97 Avenue, Edmonton, T5K 2B6, protesting the draft which will eliminate Fine Arts in Grades 7-12.
This process apparently will save the Alberta government money but what will we all lose?
Gwen Wamsley,
Benalto
Dear Editor,
Re: Tell the town what you think of the ATV-snowmobile use.
I have to agree with Brian Mooney, everyone who owns an ATV or snowmobile must attend the meeting Dec. 14 at 5:30 p.m.
I have lived in Sylvan for the better part of 19 years, and in my opinion I have slowly watched this town go from a beautiful small town and an excellent place to raise my family, to a clown filled, bylaw writing, want-to-be-city-living cry babies. They have no one to blame but themselves. They are the ones who invited all these developers in who hammered up a pile of low quality cookie cutter houses.
We then need to raise our taxes of 300 per cent in order to pay for all the needed services. Bigger sewer system, more water, let’s pave this street this week so next week we can dig it up and install a bigger water line. We need this and we need that. They have this in Calgary, they have that in Edmonton. Increased population means increased crime, increased policing, while the entire time our quality of services has gone down.
I understand the reason for growth, but some of our problems are that we have failed to control the growth, and we have failed to elect people who look after our interests rather than their own.
At the last meeting did they not defeat the proposal to change current legislation, only to then turn around and pass a reading to repeal the existing bylaw? What does this mean? You didn’t like the way the decision went so keep trying until you get what you want. Did you not ask the public this summer what they wanted, and the general public said they wanted it kept the way it was? Were you not elected by us to look after the town the way we would like to have it, only to just ignore what we want and run with your own agenda?
Everyone has complained about every ring master and their collection of clowns, this town has ever had. For the most part they have done their best, some for their own personal gain, I might add, but you are still elected for our interests not yours.
Every year I enjoy the fact that my family and I can putt down to the lake and enjoy a nice day of riding, go for a skate or park my sled on the lake and wonder into Chefs, or Chiefs for a hot chocolate or a meal, only to see a pile of clowns driving sleds or parking on the park area. I know for a fact these are not people from Sylvan, and if you are, you need a wake up call.
I remember a few years back watching a tow truck hook onto sleds and drag them up onto the road and haul them away. I just laughed, instead of a fine they should be given community service, and forced to come back in the summer and pick garbage off the beach or scrub the new multi million dollar toilets every Saturday and Sunday morning for a few weeks. Maybe they might get the picture.
Unfortunately, because of work obligations I will not be able to attend this meeting, but I am definitely sending as large a group of proxies as possible who share my opinions. Hopefully we can try to retain one thing I still enjoy in this TOWN OF ALL SEASONS
Mike Meier,
Sylvan Lake
